AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 16. MEHA2025 >
Cultural Heritage and Branding in the Digital Age: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.MEHA2025.05
Author(s)
Jiayi Yu*
Affiliation(s)
Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Southampton, Britain *Corresponding Author
Abstract
In the digital age, cultural heritage has increasingly been mobilized within branding strategies, particularly through the integration of traditional cultural artifacts, motifs, and symbols. While such practices provide opportunities for cultural visibility and commercial innovation, they also raise ethical questions about cultural appropriation, historical erasure, and the commodification of heritage. This essay examines how museums and global brands engage with cultural heritage in both physical and digital branding, drawing upon case studies such as the British Museum, the Louvre, and H&M’s controversial appropriation of Māori tā moko designs. Through critical engagement with scholarly perspectives, the discussion highlights the risks of reducing culture to mere aesthetics and proposes a “culture + creativity” framework to reconcile commercial branding with respect for cultural integrity. This approach emphasizes the need for contextualization, storytelling, and collaboration with cultural stakeholders to ensure authenticity. Ultimately, the essay argues that while branding can enhance cultural access, it must avoid perpetuating historical inequalities or reducing heritage to decorative commodities. The conclusion underscores the importance of sustained critical reflection and ethical responsibility in balancing cultural innovation with heritage preservation.
Keywords
Branding Design; Cultural Heritage; Branding; Museums; Cultural Integrity; Digital Age
References
[1]Bonacchi, C., Krzyzanska, M. Digital heritage research re-theorised: Ontologies and epistemologies in a world of big data. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2019, 25, 1235–1247. [2]Sappa C. Actions and reactions in commodifying cultural heritage hosted in museums. JIPITEC, 2023, 14(2): 161-179. [3]McClellan, A. The Art Museum from Boullée to Bilbao. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008. [4]Yang, W., Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. Three levels in culturally oriented product design: a participatory approach to cultural inspiration in design education. Design and Technology Education, 2025, 30, 1. [5]Wang, J. A Literature Review on Museum Merchandising and Branding based on Cultural Heritage Creative Design. Highlights in Art and Design, 2024, 5, 2. [6]Macdonald, S. Museums, national, postnational and transcultural identities. Museum and Society, 2003, 1, 1–16. [7]Shelton, A. Museums and anthropologies: Practices and narratives// Macdonald, S. (ed.). A Companion to Museum Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, 64–80. [8]Ober-Heilig, N. Enhancing museum brands with experiential design to attract low-involvement visitors. Journal of Marketing Management, 2015, 31, 307–324. [9]Dagalp, I., Hartmann, B.J. From “aesthetic” to aestheticization: a multi-layered cultural approach. Consumption Markets & Culture, 2021, 25, 1–20. [10]Li, Y. Museums and Marketing: A Controversy over New Strategies. Esic Market Economics and Business Journal, 2020, 51, 183–208. [11]Fitchett, J.A. Consumption and Cultural Commodification: The Case of the Museum as Commodity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stirling, Department of Marketing, 1997. [12]Cliffe, L., Mansell, J., Cormac, J., Greenhalgh, C., Hazzard, A. The Audible Artefact: Promoting Cultural Exploration and Engagement with Audio Augmented Reality. arXiv, 2024.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved