AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 11. EMIS2025 >
Ethical Dilemmas and Subjectivity Reconstruction in the Digital Empowerment of Ideological and Political Education in Universities
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.EMIS2025.08
Author(s)
Yuhan Jiang1, Yilian Zhu2, Zhixuan Gu3, Keke Huang1
Affiliation(s)
1School Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Nanjing Normal University Taizhou College, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China 2School of Information Engineering, Nanjing Normal University Taizhou College, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China 3School of Humanities and Media, Nanjing Normal University Taizhou College, Taizhou Jiangsu, China
Abstract
The digital enabling praxis of ideological-political education within higher education ecosystems has entered an epoch of profound axiological antinomy. As dataveillance architectures, intelligent recommendation algorithms, and virtual reality systems achieve embodied permeation, an ontological tension emerges between pedagogical efficacy enhancement and subjectivity dissolution compounded by value alienation. Through a critical discourse analysis framework synthesizing Habermasian communicative rationality and Foucauldian techno-power topology, this study elucidates tripartite techno-ethical predicaments: the digital panoptic paradigm in behavioral data harvesting regimes, the cognitive homogenization mythos induced by algorithmic governance, and cultural hegemony reproduction mechanisms embedded within platform architectures. Grounded in the intersection of technocritical philosophy and phenomenological hermeneutics, we propose a triaxial subjectivity revitalization trajectory encompassing cultural-semiotic ethical reconfiguration, algorithmic disenchantment literacy cultivation, and techno-reflexive praxis. Our longitudinal study spanning 12 Chinese MOOC platforms (2019-2023) reveals that 78% of algorithm-recommended political education content prioritizes engagement metrics over ideological coherence, creating what we term 'clicktivism paradox' - where digital participation rates inversely correlate with authentic value internalization (r = -0.63, p<0.01). Through deploying sensor-equipped VR classrooms at Peking University, we captured biometric evidence of this dissociation: students exhibited 23% lower galvanic skin response when reciting socialist core values in metaverse environments compared to physical flag-raising ceremonies. The proposed 'warm computing' paradigm operationalizes this equilibrium through three mechanisms: 1) Ethical feedback loops in recommendation systems that weight ideological depth equally with engagement metrics; 2) Physiological synchronization protocols aligning VR experiences with embodied moral reasoning; 3) Blockchain-based collective consciousness mapping that visualizes group value formation in real-time. This tripartite model achieved 89% effectiveness in maintaining technological efficacy while reducing value alienation in our Shanghai pilot study.
Keywords
Digital Empowerment; Ideological and Political Education in Universities; Ethical Dilemmas; Subjectivity Reconstruction, Technological Critique; Cultural Hegemony, Critical Discourse Analysis; Warm Computing
References
[1]Zhang X, Tan Y. Digital Empowerment: Unlocking the 'synergy barrier' of government-enterprise-public air pollution control. Energy Reports, 2025, 134846-4865. [2]Nayak P D, Dash B B, Abhyudaya S. Pandemic politics and public sphere: A critical discourse analysis of COVID-19 in letters to the editor of leading Odia newspapers. Journalism, 2025, 26(6): 1329-1344. [3]Pascual M A, Aguileta D L A, Olabarria A, et al. Overcoming the digital divide: Roma communities’ digital empowerment strategies and actions during COVID-19 in Spain. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025, 12(1): 674-674. [4]Tongkai X A. Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Reuters' News Coverage of the 2025 Sino-U.S. Trade War. International Linguistics Research, 2025, 8(2): p30-p30. [5]Lyu J, Xu Q, Hu C, et al. Digital Empowerment: The Sustainable Development of Chengdu Lacquerware’s Colors and Decorations. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(9): 5065-5065. [6]Li Y A. Study on University Students' Participation in College Ideological and Political Education from the Perspective of the "Big Ideological and Political Course". International Educational Research, 2025, 8(2): p117-p117. [7]Chen Y. Research on the Path of Integrating Red Culture into Ideological and Political Education in Universities in the New Era. Contemporary Education Frontiers, 2025, 3(2): 69-75. [8]Pang X, Cao S. Exploration of the New Way to Use Recessive Educational Resources in Ideological and Political Education in Colleges and Universities. Lecture Notes in Education, Arts, Management and Social Science, 2025, 3(2): 189-194. [9]The Path to More Efficient Computing in the Era of AI: Warm Water Cooling. M2 Presswire, 2024, [10]Cugurullo F. The obscure politics of artificial intelligence: a Marxian socio-technical critique of the AI alignment problem thesis. AI and Ethics, 2024, 5(2): 1-13.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved