AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 13. FSSD2025 >
The Relationship Between Teacher-Student Interaction in University Classrooms and Learning Motivation: An Empirical Study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.FSSD2025.39
Author(s)
Jinhan Liu
Affiliation(s)
School of Foreign Languages, Nanfang College Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Abstract
This empirical study systematically examines the dynamic interplay between teacher-student interaction patterns and learning motivation in Chinese undergraduate classrooms, with particular focus on foreign language learning contexts. Adopting a social constructivist perspective, we develop and validate a comprehensive four-dimensional interaction framework (behavioral, cognitive, affective, and nonverbal) through a rigorous mixed-methods research design incorporating quantitative surveys, qualitative observations, and longitudinal tracking across three academic semesters. Our investigation specifically addresses three underexplored aspects in current educational research: (1) the temporal stability of interaction-motivation correlations in sustained classroom settings, (2) the unique predictive power of nonverbal communication elements in motivational outcomes, and (3) the cultural adaptation of social constructivist principles in Chinese higher education environments. The study sample comprises 150 undergraduate students and 10 faculty members from a leading foreign language institute, ensuring both ecological validity and methodological rigor.
Keywords
Teacher-Student Interaction; Learning Motivation; University
References
[1] Cui, Y. (2012). On the LICC paradigm of classroom observation: A professional approach to lesson observation and evaluation. Educational Research, (5), 79-83. [2] Nazish, A., & Kang, M. A. (2024). Exploring the Positive Teacher-Student Relationship on Students' Motivation and Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in Karachi. Academy of Education and Social Sciences Review, 4(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.48112/aessr.v4i2.710 [3] Zhang, W., & Hu, J. (2025). The relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in Chinese senior high school English classrooms: the mediating role of learning motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563682 [4] Amna Saleem, Huma Kausar, & Farah Deeba. (2021). Social Constructivism: A New Paradigm in Teaching and Learning Environment. PERENNIAL JOURNAL OF HISTORY, 2(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86 [5] Pajević, A., D., & Fehratović, M., H. (2019). Motivation and learning. Zbornik Radova Uciteljskog Fakulteta Prizren-Leposavic, 13, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrufpl1913169p [6] Zhang, H., Chen, S., & Zheng, S. (2024). Proactive personality, interaction, and teaching strategy alignment: A conceptual-level analysis of interaction in distance learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1873–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12893-8 [7] Miao, J., Chang, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Teacher–Student Interaction, Student–Student Interaction and Social Presence: Their Impacts on Learning Engagement in Online Learning Environments. The Journal of GeneticPsychology,183(6),514-526.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2094211 [8] Gouloudis, S. E. (2020). Interaction as a Method of Educating Constructivism. In Advances in Educational Technologies and InstructionalDesign(pp.170-205).IGIGlobal.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0253-2.ch009. [9] Sultana, N., Chaudhry, A., & Idrees, N. (2023). The Influence of Teacher-Student Interaction on Student Motivation and Achievement at Secondary School Level. Global Sociological Review, VIII (II), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(viii-ii).45 [10] Owston, R., York, D. N., Malhotra, T., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2020). Blended Learning in STEM and Non-STEM Courses: How do Student Performance and Perceptions Compare? Online Learning, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2151 [11] Pawson, C. (2012). A comparative analysis of students' satisfaction with teachingon STEM vs. non-STEM programmes. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2012.18.2.16 [12] Sanovan, A., & Mudjiran, M. (2019). Relationship Between Student Social Interaction and Teacher with Student Learning Motivation. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/0097kons2019 [13] Liu, C., & Correia, A.-P. (2021). A Case Study of Learners' Engagement in Mobile Learning Applications. Online Learning, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2827 [14] Shao-bei, X., & Qun-lin, C. (2011). The Relationship among Junior Middle School Students' Seating Arrangement, Learning Motivation and Classroom Teacher-student Interaction. In Journal of Hainan Normal University (Social Sciences). [15] Zhang, W., & Hu, J. (2025). The relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in Chinese senior high school English classrooms: the mediating role of learning motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563682 [16] Wuisang, J. R., Hutahaean, L. A., & Afnita, V. (2025). Relationship Between Teacher Motivation And Student Learning Outcomes In High School. Jurnal Ilmu SosialMamangan,12(3),1210–1222. https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v12i3.5979 [17] Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1 [18] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of EducationalResearch,74(1),P59-109.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059. [19] Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 [20] Koole, T., & Elbers, E. (2014). Responsiveness in teacher explanations: A conversation analytical perspective on scaffolding. Linguistics and Education, 26, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.02.001 [21] Tinungki, G. M. (2019). ZONE PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT GIVES A NEW MEANING TO THE STUDENTS' INTELLIGENCE IN STATISTICAL METHOD LESSON. Journal of Honai Math, 2(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v2i2.69 [22] Kitchener, K. S., & King, P. M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(81)90032-0
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved