AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 14. IESD2025 >
Artificial Intelligent in International Education: A Study on Application Cases, Technical Frameworks, and Efficacy & Risk Assessment
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.IESD2025.03
Author(s)
Ziheng Wang, Suyi Yu, Zhihao Yu*
Affiliation(s)
School of innovation and Entrepreneurship (Public Experiment Center), University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Abstract
As globalization progresses at a rapid pace, the dramatic advancements in AI technology have significantly accelerated its integration into global education systems. This study explores the interplay between AI and international education, analyzes the educational transformations driven by AI adoption. We examine the integration of AI technologies—such as natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and generative AI—in addressing language barriers, personalizing learning experiences, optimizing teaching management, and fostering global educational collaboration. A systematic technical implementation framework is presented, encompassing local content processing, AI-generated content (AIGC) via cloud computing, and efficient multi-platform distribution. Case studies of leading AI platforms (e.g., ChatGPT, Grok, Qwen) demonstrate their capacity to enhance accessibility and engagement. Critical risks—including privacy vulnerabilities, algorithmic bias, cultural conflicts, and ethical concerns—are rigorously assessed, with mitigation strategies proposed. Our findings reveal that AI-driven international education not only enhances teaching efficiency and cost-effectiveness but also promotes equitable access and cross-cultural awareness. The research provides theoretical guidance for the future development of international education.
Keywords
AI; International Education; AIGC; Frameworks; Risk Assessment
References
[1] Chen, L., & Zhang, X. Y. (2017). Status, trends, and China’s policy choices in international educational cooperation and exchange. Educational Research, (6), 84-92. [2] European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning. Publications Office of the EU. [3] Guo, Q. (2000). Opportunities and challenges of modern education: The internet. E-Education Research, (3), 23-26. [4] Chen, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2023). Multilingual transformer models for low-resource language education. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 112-126. [5] Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2022). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Springer. [6] Molenaar, I. (2024). Personalisation of learning in hybrid systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(1), 1-18. [7] Knight, S., & Shum, S. B. (2023). AI for formative assessment: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 10-31. [8] Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2024). Scaffolding cross-cultural online learning: An AI-mediated framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 45-68. [9] Ke, S. (2005). Overview of contemporary American primary and secondary school curricula. Sun Yat-sen University Press. [10] Ahmed, S. T., & Roche, T. (2021). Making the connection: Examining the relationship between undergraduate students’ digital literacy and academic success in an English medium instruction (EMI) setting. Computers & Education, 168, 104188. [11] Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in school education. Routledge. [12] Hwang, G. J., Chen, N. S., & Chen, Y. C. (2021). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100001. [13] Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2024). AI for bridging the global education divide: Evidence from rural India. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 78-97. [14] Luckin, R. (2022). AI for school teachers. CRC Press. [15] Almusaed, A., Alqahtani, S., & Alenezi, M. (2024). AI-driven VR in education: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Advance online publication. [16] Patel, R., & Kulkarni, V. (2024). Generative AI in curriculum design: Opportunities and ethical risks. TechTrends, 68(2), 211-225. [17] Sharma, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2023). AIGC in MOOCs: Quality assurance mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107953. [18] Zhang, Z. G., & Yan, G. L. (2002). Game analysis of internet information resource regulation. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 24, 349-353. [19] Nguyen, A., Trinh, T., & Pham, Q. (2023). Federated learning for privacy-preserving educational data mining. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(3), 876-889. [20] Wang, T., Chen, L., & Yang, H. (2024). Blockchain-verified credentials in AI-driven education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(2), 230-241. [21] Chiu, T. K. F., Liu, O. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2023). Ethical guidelines for AI in education: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 9441-9461. [22] Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. [23] Dignum, V. (2021). Responsible artificial intelligence: How to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer Nature. [24] Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2024). Mitigating algorithmic bias in personalized learning systems. AI & Society. Advance online publication. [25] Smith, A., Johnson, L., & Williams, S. (2023). UNESCO’s AI competency framework for teachers: Implementation challenges. Educational Technology & Society, 26(4), 1-15. [26] Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury. [27] Liu, M., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). AI literacy for K-12: A competency framework. Computers & Education, 189, 104582. [28] Tang, S. C. (2010). Key issues in introducing international courses into Chinese high schools. Studies in Educational Development, (22), 12-18. [29] Yu, Z. H., Huang, M. X., Sun, S. Q., & Li, X. (2016). Thoughts on internationalized education—Internet+ promoting chemical experiment teaching. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, (3), 171-172. [30] Yu, Z. H., Wang, L., & Wang, L. (2016). Discussion on the construction of international courses in colleges and universities: Thoughts on general chemistry. Reform and Opening Up, (16), 97-99. [31] Wang, Z. (2011). Analysis of the phenomenon of younger age studying abroad in China. National Conditions Observation, (11), 27-30. [32] Zhang, Y. (2016). Analysis of the ‘Internet+Education’ concept and model. China Higher Education Research, (2), 70-73.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved