AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 15. GECSD2025 >
Research on the Multidimensional Impact of Equity Incentive Mechanism on Enterprise Innovation Performance and Optimization Strategies
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.GECSD2025.05
Author(s)
Ailin Fu
Affiliation(s)
School of Tourism, Hainan University, Haikou, China
Abstract
This study focuses on the multidimensional impact of equity incentive mechanisms on enterprise innovation performance and optimization strategies. Through literature review, case analysis, and empirical research, it explores the impact mechanisms of equity incentives on enterprise innovation investment, innovation output, and innovation transformation. The study finds that equity incentives can significantly enhance enterprise innovation performance, but their effectiveness is influenced by factors such as industry characteristics, incentive methods, and enterprise scale. This research proposes strategies for optimizing the design of equity incentive contracts, balancing long-term and short-term incentives, and improving the policy environment, providing theoretical basis and practical guidance for enterprises to enhance their innovation capabilities and competitiveness. The research results are of great significance for enriching incentive theories and expanding the research on innovation performance, while also providing references for enterprises to formulate equity incentive plans and for governments to improve relevant policies.
Keywords
Equity Incentives; Innovation Performance; Multidimensional Impact; Optimization Strategies; Enterprise Innovation; Incentive Mechanism
References
[1] Belloc, F. (2012). The role of the legal environment in promoting innovative activities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(2), 351-373. [2] Chen, X., Tang, Y., & Yao, X. (2015). Equity incentives and firm innovation: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 49-65. [3] He, X., & Tian, X. (2013). Equity incentives and innovation in Chinese firms: Evidence from listed companies. Economic Research Journal, 48(6), 113-125. [4] Holmstrom, B. (1989). Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 12(3), 305-327. [5] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. [6] Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Equity incentives and corporate R&D investment: An empirical analysis based on Chinese listed companies. Journal of Business Economics, (3), 43-54. [7] Tian, X., & Wang, Y. (2014). Equity incentives, R&D investment and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Financial Research, (10), 129-142. [8] Zhou, X., & Li, Y. (2012). Equity incentives and corporate R&D investment: An empirical study based on Chinese listed companies. Journal of Management World, (10), 117-126. [9] Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823-1860.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved