AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 15. GECSD2025 >
Compliance Adaptation Strategies for the Localization of Chinese Digital Finance Enterprises in Overseas Markets
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.GECSD2025.07
Author(s)
Jiabang Zhang1,2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Department of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, JiangSu, China 2School of Business, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
With the rapid development of China's digital finance enterprises, overseas market expansion has become an important strategic direction for them. However, there are differences in laws and regulations, regulatory policies, cultural customs, etc. among different countries and regions, which brings compliance challenges to the localization of overseas markets for Chinese digital finance enterprises. This article conducts an in-depth analysis of the compliance risks faced by Chinese digital financial enterprises in localizing overseas markets, including regulatory policy differences, data security and privacy protection, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing, etc., and proposes corresponding adaptation strategies, such as strengthening the construction of compliance management systems, conducting localized compliance training, and cooperating with local institutions, etc. It aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the compliant operation of Chinese digital finance enterprises in overseas markets.
Keywords
Chinese Digital Finance Enterprises; Localization of Overseas Markets; Compliance; Adaptation Strategy
References
[1] Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckey, R. P. (2016). FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 37, 371. [2] Xu, J. (2022). Developments and implications of central bank digital currency: The case of China e‐CNY. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(2), 235-250. [3] Claessens, S., Frost, J., Turner, G., & Zhu, F. (2018). Fintech credit markets around the world: size, drivers and policy issues. BIS Quarterly Review September. [4] Buchak, G., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2018). Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. Journal of financial economics, 130(3), 453-483. [5] Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Huang, Y., Shin, H. S., & Zbinden, P. (2019). BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation. Economic policy, 34(100), 761-799. [6] Weihuan, Z., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). Regulation of digital financial services in China: Last mover advantage. Tsinghua China L. Rev., 8, 25. [7] Hua, X., & Huang, Y. (2021). Understanding China's fintech sector: development, impacts and risks. The European Journal of Finance, 27(4-5), 321-333. [8] Feng, L. (2017). Brand choice of Chinese consumers to adopt digital payment platform in Thailand focusing on Alipay, WeChat Pay, and Union Pay (Doctoral dissertation, Bangkok University). [9] Haddad, C., & Hornuf, L. (2019). The emergence of the global fintech market: Economic and technological determinants. Small business economics, 53(1), 81-105. [10] Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213-238. [11] Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Publications. [12] Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business horizons, 61(1), 35-46.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved