AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 15. GECSD2025 >
The Application of Hofstede Theory in the Modeling of Hidden Costs in Mergers and Acquisitions
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.GECSD2025.18
Author(s)
Xinjie Li
Affiliation(s)
Department of Finance and Banking, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Jinan, Shandong, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article focuses on the application of Hofstede's theory in the modeling of hidden costs in mergers and acquisitions. Firstly, the concept and significance of hidden costs in mergers and acquisitions were expounded. Then, the core contents of Hofstede's theory were introduced in detail, including dimensions such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism and collectivism, masculinization and feminization, long-term orientation and short-term orientation. Then, deeply analyze the influencing factors of the hidden costs of mergers and acquisitions, explore how to integrate Hofstede's theory into the modeling process of hidden costs of mergers and acquisitions, and construct a model framework based on this theory and explain its application logic. Research shows that the hidden cost model of mergers and acquisitions constructed by Hofstede theory can assess the hidden costs in mergers and acquisitions more comprehensively and accurately, providing more valuable references for enterprises' merger and acquisition decisions.
Keywords
Hofstede Theory; Hidden Costs of Mergers and Acquisitions; Modeling Cultural Dimension
References
[1] Smith, A. (2003). The Wealth of Nations, Books I-III, with an Introduction by Alan B. Krueger. London: Bantam Classics. [2] Scholes, K., Johnson, G., & Whittington, R. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Financial Times Prentice Hall. [3] Klein, M. (2006). The hidden costs of mergers and acquisitions. Risk Management, 53(3), 42-43. [4] Hill, C. (2008). International business: Competing in the global market place. Strategic Direction, 24(9). [5] Moonen, P. (2017). The impact of culture on the innovative strength of nations: A comprehensive review of the theories of Hofstede, Schwartz, Boisot and Cameron and Quinn. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1149-1183. [6] Eesley, C. (2016). Institutional barriers to growth: Entrepreneurship, human capital and institutional change. Organization Science, 27(5), 1290-1306. [7] Qian, W., Chun, W. Y., Qi, H. Y., & Qi, D. (2017). Cultural Distance and Chinese Cross-Border Merger and Acquisition Performance. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 11(4). [8] Yang, N., Zhang, Y., Yu, L., Wang, J., & Liu, X. (2022). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions, regional cultural diversity and acquirers' corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China listed companies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 79, 565-578. [9] Eychenne, K., Martinetti, S., & Roncalli, T. (2011). Strategic asset allocation. Available at SSRN 2154021. [10] Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of management review, 15(4), 603-626. [11] Hanson, D., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalisation. Cengage AU. [12] Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 62-77.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved