When Performance Meets Perception: The Divergence Between ESG Ratings and ESG Performance
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.EMIS2026.11
Author(s)
Xiankang Wang*
Affiliation(s)
Faculty of Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings have become critical instruments for investors and stakeholders in assessing corporate sustainability performance. However, substantial divergence exists among ratings provided by different agencies for the same company, raising fundamental questions about the relationship between perceived ESG performance (as captured by ratings) and actual ESG outcomes. This study examines the divergence between ESG ratings and ESG performance using secondary data from six major rating agencies (MSCI, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv, S&P Global, Bloomberg, and FTSE Russell) covering 1,248 publicly traded companies across 15 industries from 2019 to 2024. Employing comprehensive methodological frameworks including correlation analysis, regression decomposition, and panel data models, we document three key findings. First, the average pairwise correlation among ESG ratings is 0.54, indicating moderate to substantial divergence that persists over time. Second, variance decomposition reveals that this divergence stems primarily from measurement differences (58%), followed by scope variations (34%), and weighting methodologies (8%). Third, higher rating divergence is associated with increased information asymmetry (7.8% higher bid-ask spreads), reduced stock price informativeness (4.3% higher market model R-squared), and lower institutional ownership (5.3% reduction). These findings have important implications for investors, Strategists, and rating agencies in understanding and addressing ESG rating heterogeneity in capital markets.
Keywords
ESG Ratings; Rating Divergence; Measurement Error; Scope Heterogeneity; Information Asymmetry; Institutional Ownership
References
[1]Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
[2]Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
[3]Biju, M. W., Sreehari, K., & Nair, A. R. (2025). ESG‐firm performance nexus: Evidence from an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 1847-1865. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4152
[4]Brandon, R. G., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1963186
[5]Chen, S., & Fan, M. (2024). ESG ratings and corporate success: Analyzing the environmental governance impact on Chinese companies' performance. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1371616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1371616
[6]Dong, M., Li, M., Wang, H., & Pang, Y. (2025). ESG disagreement and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 32(1), 267-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-024-09458-9
[7]Geng, R., Chen, L., & Liu, Z. (2024). ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 3899-3918. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2754
[8]Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., Stroebel, J., Tan, Z., Utkus, S., & Xu, X. (2025). Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios. Journal of Financial Economics, 164, 103984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103984
[9]Guo, K., Bian, Y., Zhang, D., & Ji, Q. (2024). ESG performance and corporate external financing in China: The role of rating disagreement. Research in International Business and Finance, 70(B), 102348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102348
[10]Hu, J., Li, X., & Li, B. (2024). Can ESG ratings promote green transformation of enterprises? Quantitative & Technical Economics Research, 40(7), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2023.07.005
[11]Ling, F., Xia, H., & Liu, L. (2024). ESG rating divergence and audit pricing: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 43(3), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2022-137
[12]Liu, M., Dai, Z., Dong, W., & Liu, S. (2024). ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 70(B), 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102419
[13]Liu, Y., & Osterrieder, J. (2023). Navigating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) landscape: Constructing a robust and reliable scoring engine. Open Research Europe, 3, 119. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16278.1
[14]Luo, D., Yan, N., & Xiong, W. (2023). ESG rating divergence and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104545
[15]Mao, Z., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. E. (2024). ESG, ESG rating divergence and earnings management: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3328-3347. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2722
[16]Nian, H., & Said, F. F. (2025). The impact of ESG on firm risk and financial performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Scientometric Research, 13(3s), s144-s155. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.20041187
[17]Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2023). Stock price reactions to ESG news: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(3), 1500-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3
[18]Pan, A. (2023). ESG rating divergence and stock returns: Evidence from quantile regression analysis. Energy Economics, 129, 107276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107276
[19]Vu, T. N., Lehkonen, H., Junttila, J. P., & Lucey, B. (2025). ESG investment performance and global attention to sustainability. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 75(A), 102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102287
[20]Wang, H., Jiao, S., Ge, C., & Sun, G. (2024). Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns. Energy Economics, 129, 107276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107276
[21]Wang, Q., & Liu, M. (2024). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 936798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936798
[22]Yin, X., Xu, X., Chen, Q., & Peng, J. (2023). How does ESG performance affect stock returns? Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(5), e16320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16320
[23]Zhou, J., Lei, X., & Yu, J. (2024). ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2911-2930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3659
[24]Zou, S., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2023). ESG rating disagreement and corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Banking & Finance, 156, 106991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106991