Minimum-Factor Value Co-Creation in Urban Digital Economies: An Ecological-Constraint Framework for Differentiated Growth Models
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.EMIS2026.15
Author(s)
Chongren Bi1, Yun Zhao2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Postdoctoral Programme of China Centre for Industrial Security Research (CCISR), Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
2School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Urban digital economies exhibit pronounced regional heterogeneity: some cities scale rapidly through platform-led networks, others expand through digitally enabled industrial symbiosis, while still others rely on deep user participation and demand-driven innovation. This conceptual paper integrates value co-creation theory with an ecological limiting-factor perspective grounded in Liebig’s Law of the Minimum. A minimum-factor value co-creation framework is developed in which the evolution of a city’s digital business ecosystem is shaped by a binding ecological constraint that conditions the dominant co-creation pathway and, consequently, the prevailing growth model; iterative feedback then reconfigures ecosystem capabilities and boundaries over time. Building on four schematics, three archetypal urban growth models are delineated—platform-driven, enterprise-symbiotic, and user-enabled—and their respective bottlenecks are specified: policy adaptability for platform-led ecosystems, technology compatibility and innovation capacity for enterprise symbiosis, and user scale and engagement, reinforced by data trust, for user-enabled ecosystems. The framework advances ecosystem research by explaining city-level model differentiation as a constraint-activated selection among co-creation pathways and by translating minimum-factor logic into a governance toolkit centered on dynamic monitoring and targeted interventions across infrastructure, talent, market demand, policy institutions, and competition–cooperation structures.
Keywords
Value Co-Creation; Digital Business Ecosystem; Urban Digital Economy; Limiting Factors; Minimum-Factor Framework; Differentiated Development
References
[1]VARGO S L, MAGLIO P P, AKAKA M A. On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 2008, 26(3): 145-152.
[2]RAMASWAMY V, OZCAN K. What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 84: 196-205.
[3]AKSOY C. Digital business ecosystems: An environment of collaboration, innovation, and value creation in the digital age. Journal of business and trade, 2023, 4(2): 156-180.
[4]ADNER R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(4): 98.
[5]CHEKFOUING T, SUNIL D, BINITA G. Conceptualising capabilities and value co-creation in a digital business ecosystem (DBE): A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 2020, 5(1): 1-12.
[6]MEILHAN D. Customer value co-creation behavior in the online platform economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2019, 7(1): 19-24.
[7]FALKENRECK C, WAGNER R. From managing customers to joint venturing with customers: Co-creating service value in the digital age. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2022, 37(3): 643-656.
[8]NAMBISAN S, ZAHRA S A, LUO Y. Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50: 1464-1486.
[9]SRIVASTAVA D S, VELLEND M. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation?. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2005, 36: 267-294.
[10]TAWASTSTJERNA T, OLANDER H. Managing digital transformation in digital business ecosystems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2021, 25(10): 2140003.
[11]WU M, LIU Y, CHUNG H F, et al. When and how mobile payment platform complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and modularization analysis. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 139: 843-854.
[12]KIM H, KIM H, WOOSNAM K M. Understanding social innovation and governance in urban redevelopment: systematic literature review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2026: 1-25.
[13]SELANDER L, HENFRIDSSON O, SVAHN F. Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. Journal of Information Technology, 2013, 28(3): 183-197.
[14]PENG D M, HOMBURG C, KUEHNL C. Digital business capability: Its impact on firm and customer performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2021, 49(4): 762-789.
[15]MBANEFO C C, GROBBELAAR S S. Unveiling the core elements of platform ecosystem development: A systemic lens for value co-creation in small and medium enterprises and orchestrators. Management Review Quarterly, 2025, 75(2): 1575-1618.
[16]GOETZ F, TÜRKMEN I, BUCK C, et al. Investigating social factors and their impact on value co-creation in supply chain ecosystems. Journal of global operations and strategic sourcing, 2023, 16(1): 69-89.
[17]BIRKIN F, POLESIE T, LEWIS L. A new business model for sustainable development: an exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2009, 18(5): 277-290.
[18]HEIN A, WEKING J, SCHREIECK M, et al. Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic markets, 2019, 29(3): 503-518.
[19]CLOUTIER L, MESSEGHEM K. Whirlwind model of entrepreneurial ecosystem path dependence. Small Business Economics, 2022, 59(2): 611-625.
[20]DÍAZ de LEÓN D, RIVERA I, BANDINI F, et al. The Role of B Corps in the Mexican Economic System: An Exploratory Study. Sustainability, 2025, 17(13): 6084.