AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 17. EMIS2026 >
ESG Performance and Economic Consequences: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Ratings Shape Financing Costs and Stock Returns
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.EMIS2026.23
Author(s)
Yiran Wang
Affiliation(s)
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance has emerged as a central variable in capital allocation, yet its economic consequences remain contested. This paper synthesizes the theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence linking ESG ratings to financing costs and stock returns across firm-, market-, and institutional-level contexts. Drawing on asset-pricing theory, stakeholder theory, and disclosure research, we examine how risk mitigation, information quality, governance discipline, and investor preferences translate ESG signals into observable capital-market outcomes. Evidence consistently shows that stronger ESG performance reduces both debt and equity financing costs by lowering perceived downside risk, improving transparency, and broadening the investor base. Stock-return evidence is more ambiguous: ESG-associated return outperformance tends to emerge during crisis periods and market repricing episodes, but may compress once sustainable preferences are institutionalized. Rating divergence across providers further complicates inference. These findings suggest that ESG functions as a conditional force—reshaping financing terms reliably, but reshaping expected returns only under specific institutional conditions, timing, and measurement frameworks.
Keywords
ESG; Cost of Capital; Cost of Equity; Cost of Debt; Stock Returns; Sustainable Investing; Rating Divergence
References
[1] Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 [2] Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 [3] Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011 [4] Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001 [5] Kräussl, R., Oladiran, T., & Stefanova, D. (2024). A review on ESG investing: Investors’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(2), 476–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12599 [6] El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007 [7] Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002 [8] Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223–2247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863 [9] Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(4), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006 [10] Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383 [11] Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 [12] Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 [13] Postiglione, M., Carini, C., & Falini, A. (2024). ESG and firm value: A hybrid literature review on cost of capital implications from Scopus database. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6457–6480. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2940 [14] Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. The Financial Review, 49(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12025 [15] Ge, W., & Liu, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and the cost of corporate bonds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.05.008 [16] Chen, Y., Li, T., Zeng, Q., & Zhu, B. (2023). Effect of ESG performance on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.09.001 [17] Gigante, G., & Manglaviti, D. (2022). The ESG effect on the cost of debt financing: A sharp RD analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102382 [18] El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2018). Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3005-6 [19] Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 [20] Priem, R., & Gabellone, A. (2024). The impact of a firm’s ESG score on its cost of capital: Can a high ESG score serve as a substitute for a weaker legal environment? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(3), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2023-0254 [21] Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716 [22] Mǎnescu, C. (2011). Stock returns in relation to environmental, social and governance performance: Mispricing or compensation for risk? Sustainable Development, 19(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.510 [23] Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 [24] Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005 [25] Yin, X.-N., Li, J.-P., & Su, C.-W. (2023). How does ESG performance affect stock returns? Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(5), e16320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16320 [26] Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043 [27] Zou, J., Yan, J., & Deng, G. (2023). ESG rating confusion and bond spreads. Economic Modelling, 129, 106555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106555 [28] Fiorillo, P., Meles, A., Ricciardi, A., & Verdoliva, V. (2025). ESG performance and the cost of debt: Evidence from the corporate bond market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104097 [29] Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1257–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12174 [30] Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved