AEPH
Home > Conferences > Vol. 17. EMIS2026 >
The Impact of Green Credit on Bank Asset Quality: Does Green Lending Reduce Non-Performing Loan Ratios?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.EMIS2026.25
Author(s)
Yiran Wang
Affiliation(s)
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Abstract
Green credit has emerged as a key policy instrument aligning banking capital allocation with environmental transition. This paper examines whether green lending improves bank asset quality by reducing non-performing loan (NPL) ratios, analyzing the theoretical channels, empirical evidence, and institutional conditions underlying this relationship. Four mechanisms are identified: enhanced environmental risk screening during credit appraisal, portfolio reallocation away from pollution-intensive sectors, selection of higher-quality borrowers meeting stricter disclosure standards, and improved internal risk governance catalyzed by green lending implementation. The analysis of existing empirical studies reveals that green credit generally contributes to lower NPL ratios, but the effect is conditional rather than automatic. Green lending improves asset quality most effectively when it operates as genuine risk governance, with banks embedding long-term transition risk into loan assessment. However, where green classification is vague, political pressure outweighs commercial discipline, or banks lack project-monitoring capacity, green credit may rename risk rather than reduce it. The paper concludes that green credit tends to lower NPL ratios only when environmental criteria are translated into substantive credit discipline, supported by clear taxonomy, robust disclosure, and strong bank-level monitoring capacity.
Keywords
Green Credit; Bank Asset Quality; Non-Performing Loans; Green Lending; Credit Risk; Sustainable Finance
References
[1] Meeker, L. G., & Gray, L. L. (1987). A note on non-performing loans as an indicator of asset quality. Journal of Banking & Finance, 11(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(87)90028-8 [2] Berger, A. N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00003-4 [3] Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.012 [4] Alnabulsi, K., Kozarevic, E., Al-Matari, E. M., & Al-Homaidi, E. A. (2023). Non-performing loans as a driver of banking distress: A systematic literature review. Commodities, 2(2), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities2020007 [5] Thompson, P., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). Bringing the environment into bank lending: Implications for environmental reporting. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2003.11.005 [6] Weber, O. (2017). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066 [7] Akomea-Frimpong, I., Adeabah, D., Ofosu, D., & Tenakwah, E. J. (2022). A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1241–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1870202 [8] Toma, P., & Stefanelli, V. (2022). What are the banks doing in managing climate risk? Empirical evidence from a position map. Ecological Economics, 200, 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107530 [9] Cui, Y., Geobey, S., Weber, O., & Lin, H. (2018). The impact of green lending on credit risk in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062008 [10]Guan, R., Zheng, H., Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Ren, R. (2017). The higher carbon intensity of loans, the higher non-performing loan ratio: The case of China. Sustainability, 9(4), 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040667 [11]Zhou, X. Y., Caldecott, B., Hoepner, A. G. F., & Wang, Y. (2022). Bank green lending and credit risk: An empirical analysis of China’s Green Credit Policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2973 [12]Gao, X., Guo, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). The green credit policy impact on the financial performance of commercial banks: A quasi-natural experiment from China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 9087498. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9087498 [13]Feng, Y., Pan, Y., Sun, C., & Niu, J. (2024). Assessing the effect of green credit on risk-taking of commercial banks in China: Further analysis on the two-way Granger causality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140698 [14]Huang, Z., Gao, N., & Jia, M. (2023). Green credit and its obstacles: Evidence from China’s green credit guidelines. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102441
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved