Intimacy in Four Operas by Benjamin Britten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.HEED2026.19
Author(s)
Yufan Lou
Affiliation(s)
The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam Road, Central and Western District, Hong Kong, China
Abstract
Benjamin Britten is a famous genius composer in England, who left several operas with distinctive personal characteristics in his life. In these operas, there is also a lot of detail about his characters in the intimate relationship as an expression of the stance to argue against the stereotypes of the gender relationship in the art. Many of Britten’s operas deal with the relationship of males and males in love. And some even have specific contexts of same-gender emotional affiliations. In critical interpretations, opera can be understood as an artistic medium through which Britten explores and projects emotional experiences[1]. His partnership with Peter Peirce, who was also a major actor in many of his operas, was an important drive for spirits to write his opera. Their private relationship has informed biographical readings of the emotional relationships represented in the operas. The relationship between Billy Budd and the captain, who are the main characters in the opera Billy Budd, is believed to be related to Britten’s own love experience. In some of his operas, including Billy Budd, and Death in Venice, same-gender emotional affiliations and sexual orientation are explored topics in these operas. These works have been interpreted as Britten’s attempt to express his values and opinions on intimate relationships and love in music based on his identity, his experience, and society’s attitude towards people with same-gender emotional affiliations. This paper intends to analyze Benjamin Britten’s discussion of intimacy from four operas, Peter Grimes, The Turn of the Screw, Billy Budd and Death in Venice.
Keywords
Benjamin Britten; British Opera; Intimacy; Same-Gender Emotional Affiliations; Social Discrimination; Musical Expression
References
[1] Ashby, A. (2013). “Peter Grimes and the ‘Tuneful Air’”. In: Rupprecht, P. (ed.), Rethinking Britten. UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794805.003.0004.
[2] Baker, M. (2020). Motives and Motivations: Linkage Technique in Britten’s Operas and Other Vocal Works. In Decker, G.J. and Shaftel, M.R. (eds), Singing in Signs: New Semiotic Explorations of Opera. UK: Oxford Academic, pp. 73–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190620622.003.0004.
[3] Bernhart, W. (2009). “‘Pour Out … Forgiveness Like a Wine’: Can Music ‘Say an Existence is Wrong’?”. In: Chapin, K., and Kramer, L. (eds), Musical Meaning and Human Values. [Online] NY: Fordham Scholarship Online, 10 Mar. 2011, pp. 170–184. https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823230099.003.0009.
[4] Brett, P., Wiebe, H., Doctor, J., LeGrove, J., & Banks, P. (2001). Britten, (Edward) Benjamin. UK: Grove Music Online, pp. 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.46435.
[5] Brett, P. (2006). ‘Salvation at Sea: Britten’s Billy Budd’. In Haggerty, G. (ed.), Music and Sexuality in Britten: Selected Essays. Oakland: California Scholarship Online, 24 May, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520246096.003.0005.
[6] Brett, P., McClary, S., & Doctor, J. (2006). “Britten’s Bad Boys: Male Relations in The Turn of the Screw.” In G. E. Haggerty (Ed.), Music and Sexuality in Britten: Selected Essays (pp. 88–105). USA: University of California Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnd5h.10.
[7] Hindley, C. (1992). Platonic Elements in Britten’s ‘Death in Venice. Music and Letters, 73(3), pp. 407–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/73.3.407.
[8] Hindley, C. (1992). Homosexual Self-affirmation and Self-oppression in Two Britten Operas. The Musical Quarterly, 76(2), pp. 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/mq/76.2.143.
[9] Hutcheon, L., & Hutcheon, M. (2015). Benjamin Britten (1913–1976): The Life Narratives of the Ever-Young “Working Composer”. In Four Last Songs: Aging and Creativity in Verdi, Strauss, Messiaen, and Britten (pp. 79–95). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226255620.003.0006.
[10] Kramer, L. (2004). Opera and Modern Culture: Wagner and Strauss. USA: University of California Press, pp. 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520241732.003.0002.
[11] Mark, C. (2011). Benjamin Britten: New Perspectives on his Life and Work. Music and Letters, 92(1), pp. 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcq094.
[12] Peraino, J. (2005). Listening to the Sirens: Musical Technologies of Queer Identity from Homer to Hedwig. USA: University of California Press, pp. 68–109. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520215870.003.0003.
[13] Rupprecht, P. (2013). ‘Introduction: Britten’s Music and Its Audiences’, in Rethinking Britten. UK: Oxford Academic, pp. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794805.002.0007.
[14] Stroeher, V. P., & Vickers, J. (2022). “The Britten Circle(s),” in Benjamin Britten in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Composers in Context), pp. 11–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108634878.
[15] Sheppard, W. A. (2001). Revealing Masks: Exotic Influence and Ritualized Performance in Modernist Music Theater (Vol. 1). USA: University of California Press, pp. 126–154. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520223028.003.0009.
[16] Venn, E. (2008). Benjamin Britten: The Spiritual Dimension. Music and Letters, 89(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcm023.
[17] Whittall, A. (2005). The Operas of Benjamin Britten: Expression and Evasion. Music and Letters, 86(3), pp. 513–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gci092.