The Structure and Traffic Monetization of Creator Affective Networks: The Mediating Role of Emotional Connection in Monetization Efficiency
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/ACS.HEED2026.21
Author(s)
Jinbu Han
Affiliation(s)
Department of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China
Abstract
The creator economy enables individuals to convert attention and community participation into advertising, sponsorship, subscription, tipping, affiliate, and product revenue. Yet creators with similar traffic often achieve different commercial outcomes, indicating that audience size alone cannot explain monetization efficiency. This paper develops a theoretical model in which creator affective network structure influences monetization through emotional connection. Affective networks are relational systems formed through repeated interaction, trust, identification, belonging, and parasocial closeness. Their structural properties include size, centrality, density, reciprocity, tie strength, clustering, and community cohesion. The paper argues that these properties create economic value only when they strengthen emotional connection, which then supports engagement, trust-based conversion, retention, and cross-product purchasing. Platform affordances, creator authenticity, content type, commercial intensity, audience heterogeneity, and creator–product fit are proposed as boundary conditions. The framework shifts analysis from traffic volume to relational efficiency and integrates social-network, parasocial-interaction, influencer-marketing, and relationship-marketing research.
Keywords
Creator Economy; Affective Network; Emotional Connection; Traffic Monetization; Monetization Efficiency; Parasocial Interaction
References
[1] Hua, Y., Ribeiro, M. H., West, R., Ristenpart, T., & Naaman, M. (2022). Characterizing alternative monetization strategies on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, 3392–3403.
[2] De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828.
[3] Romero, D. M., Galuba, W., Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2011). Influence and passivity in social media. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 113–114.
[4] Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519.
[5] Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–148.
[6] Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73.
[7] Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742.
[8] Jin, S. V., & Ryu, E. (2020). “I’ll buy what she’s #wearing”: The roles of envy toward and parasocial interaction with influencers in Instagram celebrity-based brand endorsement and social commerce. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102121.
[9] Hollebeek, L. D., & Macky, K. (2019). Digital content marketing’s role in fostering consumer engagement, trust, and value: Framework, fundamental propositions, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45, 27–41.
[10] Ki, C.-W. C., & Kim, Y.-K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing, 36(10), 905–922.
[11] Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity versus influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product–endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281.
[12] Bertaglia, T., Goanta, C., & Iamnitchi, A. (2024). The monetisation of toxicity: Analysing YouTube content creators and controversy-driven engagement. arXiv.