Search

Implications for Electronic Records Encapsulation Strategies: A Comparative Analysis of METS and VEO

Author(s)

Yi Jiang1, Pingping Song2, Rong Shu2

Affiliation(s)

1College of Arts and Science, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China 2State Development & Investment Corp, Beijing, China

Abstract

This research examines the packaging methodology for electronic records, with particular emphasis on the component-based design of the US METS 2.0 specification and its benefits in metadata consolidation and resource linkage. The investigation further analyzes the characteristics of Australia's VEO 3.0 standard, highlighting its distinctive approaches to separating logical and physical components while maintaining data integrity. In response to practical challenges faced by China's Electronic records Encapsulation Package (EEP)—such as difficulties in traceability and utilization, data package invalidation due to directory structure changes, and performance bottlenecks in file access—this study proposes recommendations based on a comparative analysis of mainstream international encapsulation strategies. These recommendations include decoupling the logical structure from physical storage, constructing an open metadata framework, and adopting a hierarchical encapsulation approach. The article aims to provide references for improving electronic records encapsulation standards and to promote the establishment of encapsulation specifications that align with China's practical needs while incorporating advanced and operable features.

Keywords

Electronic Records; Records Encapsulation; Long-Term Preservation

References

[1] Wang Bo, Qu Jian, Huang Yan. Enlightenment of Australia's New VERS Standard on China's Electronic Records Metadata Encapsulation Strategy: A Comparative Study Based on VEO 3.0 and EEP. China Archives, 2025, (3):70-72. [2] Liu Yuenan. Rethinking the Metadata Encapsulation Strategy for Electronic Records: A Study Triggered by Changes in the VERS Standard. Archives Science Study, 2019, (4):116-123. [3] Cheng Yanyan. A Comparative Study of International Electronic Records Metadata Encapsulation Methods VEO and METS. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011, (10):7-11. [4] Luo Wenwu. A Comparative Study of Electronic Records Encapsulation Strategies. Master's Thesis, Zhejiang University, 2013. [5] Du Linlin, Yuan Jiaxin. Research on Technical Strategies for Long-term Preservation of Electronic Archives. China Archives, 2021, (12):67-69. [6] Huang Jianfeng, Yuan Ping, Dai Min, et al. Setting and Analysis of Management Objects in RASM Mode. Archives Science Communication, 2024, (6):39-45. [7] Xia Zhenhua, Chen Lin. Interpretation of "Specifications for Archiving Electronic Records of Government Service Matters". China Archives, 2023, (11):26-27. [8] Fang Xia, Zhu Zhenhui. Discussion on the Technical Path of "Electronic Archiving" in Digital Archives Room. Zhejiang Archives, 2023, (10):13-15. [9] Li Chunwei. Exploration of a Universal Archiving Interface Scheme for Enterprise Digital Archives (Rooms). Beijing Archives, 2023, (4):36-39. [10]Dwight Owens, Dilumie Abeysirigunawardena, Ben Biffard,et al. "The oceans 2.0/3.0 data management and archival system." Frontiers in Marine Science 9 (2022): 806452.