Search

Research on the Influence Mechanism of Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emission Reduction - Analysis based on Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Cities

Author(s)

Wang Guozhi, Zhong Zhiwei

Affiliation(s)

School of Economics and Management, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, Jilin, China

Abstract

The realization of the "dual-carbon" goal is an important stage in promoting the green and low-carbon transformation of China's economy, and whether the market-incentivized environmental regulation represented by carbon emissions trading can promote energy conservation and emission reduction of the whole society, and thus realize the sustainable development of the economy and the environment, plays a crucial role. The article takes China's carbon emissions trading pilot project, which was officially launched in 2013, as a quasi-natural experiment, and empirically examines the mechanism of the impact of China's carbon emissions trading pilot project on carbon emissions reduction effects by using panel data from 30 provinces across the country from 2004 to 2021, applying double-difference modeling and propensity score matching, among other methods. The study finds that: (1) carbon emissions trading can effectively reduce carbon emissions; (2) the mediation effect shows that the policy effect is played out thanks to the green innovation effect and the energy consumption structure adjustment effect; (3) the heterogeneity analysis shows that carbon emissions trading has a more significant effect on carbon emissions reduction in the economically developed regions as well as in regions with a lower proportion of secondary industries.

Keywords

Environmental Regulations; Carbon Emission Trading Mechanism; Low-Carbon Technological Innovation; Energy Consumption Structure

References

[1] Adamolekun G, Adedoyin F F, Siganos A. Firm-level pollution and membership of emission trading schemes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 351: 119970. [2] Ambec S, Cohen M A, Elgie S, et al. The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?[J]. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2013. 7(1): 2-22. [3] Anderson B, Di Maria C. Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 48: 83-103. [4] Bel G, Joseph S. Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis[J]. Energy Economics, 2015, 49: 531-539. [5] Chen Y, Hasan I, Saffar W, et al. Executive equity risk-taking incentives and firms’ choice of debt structure [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2021, 133: 106274. [6] Environmental policies, innovation and productivity in the EU [J]. Global Economy Journal, 2016, 16 (4): 615-635. [7] Dong, Kangyin, et al. "CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: empirical evidence across regions." Energy Economics 75 (2018): 180-192. [8] Dong, Zhi-Qing, et al. "The validity of carbon emission trading policies: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China." Advances in Climate Change Research 11.2 (2020): 102-109. [9] Gray W B, Shadbegian R J. Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 46(3): 384-402. [10] Hong Q, Cui L, Hong P. The impact of carbon emissions trading on energy efficiency: Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's carbon emissions trading pilot [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 110: 106025. [11] Hu Y, Ren S, Wang Y, et al. Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China [J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 85: 104590. [12] Huang, W., Wang, Q., Li, H., Fan, H., Qian, Y., & Klemeš, J. J. "Review of recent progress of emission trading policy in China." Journal of Cleaner Production 349 (2022): 131480. [13] Jiang H D, Liu L J, Dong K, et al. How will sectoral coverage in the carbon trading system affect the total oil consumption in China? A CGE-based analysis[J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 110: 105996. [14] Kneller R, Manderson E. Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2012, 34(2): 211-235. [15] Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R. Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis[J]. Journal of productivity analysis, 2008, 30: 121-128. [16] Lin, Boqiang, and Zhijie Jia. "Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market." Applied energy 239 (2019): 157-170. [17] Liu, X., Niu, Q., Dong, S., & Zhong, S. "How does renewable energy consumption affect carbon emission intensity? Temporal-spatial impact analysis in China." Energy 284 (2023): 128690. [18] Liu, Yanbo, and Mingshun Guo. "The impact of FDI on haze pollution:“Pollution paradise” or “pollution halo?”-Spatial analysis of PM2. 5 concentration raster data in 283 cities." Frontiers in Environmental Science 11 (2023): 1133178. [19] Martin R, Muûls M, Wagner U J. The impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on regulated firms: what is the evidence after ten years? [J]. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2016. [20] Ribeiro, Haroldo V., Diego Rybski, and Jürgen P. Kropp. "Effects of changing population or density on urban carbon dioxide emissions." Nature communications 10.1 (2019): 3204. [21] Wen H X, Chen Z R, Nie P Y. Environmental and economic performance of China’s ETS pilots: New evidence from an expanded synthetic control method [J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 2999-3010. [22] Yuan, B and Q Xiang. "Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: Based on an extended CDM model." Journal of Cleaner Production 176 (2018): 895-908. [23] Zhang, D., Zhao, M., Wang, Y., Vigne, S. A., & Benkraiem, R. "Technological innovation and its influence on energy risk management: Unpacking China’s energy consumption structure optimisation amidst climate change." Energy economics 131 (2024): 107321. [24] Zhang, Guitao, et al. "Three-echelon closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium under cap-and-trade regulation." Sustainability 13.11 (2021): 6472. [25] Zhang H, Duan M, Deng Z. Have China's pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?–the evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 234: 912-924. [26] Zhang, H., Wang, X., Ma, Y., & Zhao, D. "The pilot trading of carbon emission rights and upgrading of industrial structure." International Journal of Environment and Pollution 68.1-2 (2020): 82-99. [27] Zhang M, Ge Y, Liu L, et al. Impacts of carbon emission trading schemes on the development of renewable energy in China: Spatial spillover and mediation paths[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, 32: 306-317. [28] Zhang, W., Li, J., Li, G., & Guo, S. "Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China." Energy 196 (2020): 117117. [29] Zhang Y J, Peng Y L, Ma C Q, et al. Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China [J]. Energy Policy, 2017, 100: 18-28. [30] Zhang, Y., Li, S., Luo, T., & Gao, J. "The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China." Journal of Cleaner Production 265 (2020): 121843. [31] Zhu, H., Cao, S., Su, Z., & Zhuang, Y. "China's future energy vision: Multi-scenario simulation based on energy consumption structure under dual carbon targets." Energy 301 (2024): 131751.