AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 2 No. 6 (ESH 2025) >
Green Gambling: Local Government Sustainable Energy Investments amid UK Austerity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E254616
Author(s)
Junrong Chen*
Affiliation(s)
School of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom *Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article examines how Nottingham City Council and Thurrock Council, two English local authorities, pursued ambitious sustainable energy investments amidst severe austerity measures and dwindling central government funding. The research draws on the debt-driven development model, which synthesises entrepreneurial urbanism with austerity urbanism, to investigate how local authorities, under acute fiscal constraints, initiate ambitious energy projects to generate revenue and address social priorities. Using a qualitative, document-based case study approach, the study analyses council records, financial statements, policy documents, and external audit reports to investigate the motivations, strategies, and outcomes of these investments. The results demonstrate that Nottingham City Council adopted a municipalist approach by establishing a not-for-profit energy company, while Thurrock Council undertook large-scale investments in renewable energy projects, predominantly funded through short-term borrowing. Both councils initially aimed to generate revenue and deliver social or environmental benefits, but ultimately experienced severe financial losses. These failures are attributed to inadequate risk management, weak oversight, and overly optimistic financial projections. The article concludes that debt-driven development models require robust oversight and risk management frameworks, and that local authorities navigating fiscal crisis should balance innovation with prudent governance to safeguard public resources and maintain financial resilience.
Keywords
Austerity Urbanism; Debt-Driven Development; Municipal Investment; Sustainable Energy; Local Government Finance; Financial Sustainability
References
[1]Dagdeviren, H. Austerity urbanism, local government debt-drive, and post COVID predicaments in Britain. Journal of Economic Geography 2024, 24, 79-94, doi:10.1093/jegad031. [2]Donald, B.; Glasmeier, A.; Gray, M.; Lobao, L. Austerity in the city: economic crisis and urban service decline? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2014, 7, 3-15, doi:10.1093res/rst040. [3]Tabb, W.K. The wider context of austerity urbanism. City 2014, 18, 87-100, doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.896645. [4]Harvey, D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 1989, 71, 3-17, doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583. [5]Peck, J. Entrepreneurial urbanism: Between uncommon sense and dull compulsion. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 2014, 96, 396-401, doi:10.1111/geob.12061. [6]Peck, J. Austerity urbanism: American cities under extreme economy. City 2012, 16, 626-655, doi:10.1080/13604813.2012.734071. [7]Davidson, M.; Ward, K. ‘Picking up the pieces’: Austerity urbanism, California and fiscal crisis. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2013, 7, 81-97, doi:10.1093res/rst030. [8]Davies, J.S.; Blanco, I. Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neo-liberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2017, 49, 1517-1536, doi:10.1177/0308518x17701729. [9]NAO. Local authority investment in commercial property; National Audit Office: London, 2020. [10]Thompson, M.; Nowak, V.; Southern, A.; Davies, J.; Furmedge, P. Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2020, 52, 1171-1194, doi:10.1177/0308518x19899698. [11]Lauermann, J. Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Human Geography 2018, 42, 205-224, doi:10.1177/0309132516673240. [12]Wood, A. Making sense of urban entrepreneurialism. Scottish Geographical Magazine 1998, 114, 120-123, doi:10.1080/00369229818737040. [13]Harvey, D. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change; Basil Blackwell: Cambridge, Mass, 1989. [14]Joppke, C. The crisis of the welfare state, collective consumption, and the rise of new social actors. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 1987, 32, 237-260. [15]While, A.; Jonas, A.E.G.; Gibbs, D. The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2004, 28, 549-569, doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x. [16]Fuller, C. Entrepreneurial urbanism, austerity and economic governance. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2018, 11, 565-585, doi:10.1093res/rsy023. [17]Hackworth, J. The public-private partnership. In The neoliberal city; Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism; Cornell University Press: 2007; pp. 61-76. [18]Swyngedouw, E.; Moulaert, F.; Rodriguez, A. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. Antipode 2002, 34, 542-577, doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00254. [19]Hodge, G.A. The risky business of public–private partnerships. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2004, 63, 37-49, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00400.x. [20]Jomo, K.S.; Chowdhury, A. PPPs: Public Costs and Risks for Private Profits. Development 2018, 61, 89-93, doi:10.1057/s41301-018-0188-z. [21]Davidson, M.; Ward, K. Post-great recession municipal budgeting and governance: A mixed methods analysis of budget stress and reform. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2022, 54, 634-652, doi:10.1177/0308518x211068051. [22]Hastings, A.; Bailey, N.; Bramley, G.; Gannon, M. Austerity urbanism in England: The ‘regressive redistribution’ of local government services and the impact on the poor and marginalised. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2017, 49, 2007-2024, doi:10.1177/0308518x17714797. [23]Gray, M.; Barford, A. The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2018, 11, 541-563, doi:10.1093res/rsy019. [24]Fitzgerald, A.; Lupton, R. The Limits to Resilience? The Impact of Local Government Spending Cuts in London. Local Government Studies 2015, 41, 582-600, doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1040154. [25]Kitson, M.; Martin, R.; Tyler, P. The geographies of austerity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2011, 4, 289-302, doi:10.1093res/rsr030. [26]Lobao, L.M.; Adua, L. State rescaling and local governments' austerity policies across the USA, 2001–2008. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2011, 4, 419-435, doi:10.1093res/rsr022. [27]Meegan, R.; Kennett, P.; Jones, G.; Croft, J. Global economic crisis, austerity and neoliberal urban governance in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2014, 7, 137-153, doi:10.1093res/rst033. [28]Schindler, S. Detroit after bankruptcy: A case of degrowth machine politics. Urban Studies 2016, 53, 818-836, doi:10.1177/0042098014563485. [29]Parés, M.; Boada, J.; Canal, R.; Hernando, E.; Martínez, R. Challenging collaborative urban governance under austerity: How local governments and social organizations deal with housing policy in Catalonia (Spain). Journal of Urban Affairs 2017, 39, 1066-1084, doi:10.1080/07352166.2017.1310531. [30]Kim, Y.; Warner, M.E. Pragmatic municipalism or austerity urbanism? Understanding local government responses to fiscal stress. Local Government Studies 2021, 47, 234-252, doi:10.1080/03003930.2020.1729751. [31]Davidson, M.; Lukens, D.; Ward, K. The Post–Great Recession Geographies of U.S. Municipal Borrowing and Indebtedness. The Professional Geographer 2021, 73, 240-253, doi:10.1080/00330124.2020.1858886. [32]Kenyon, M.; Clarke-Ezzidio, H. Council bankruptcy tracker: authorities under increasing financial strain. 2024. [33]Sandford, M. Local authority financial resilience; House of Commons Library: London, 2024. [34]Yin, R.K. Case study research: design and methods, 5th ed.; SAGE: Los Angeles, 2014. [35]Flyvbjerg, B. Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 2006, 12, 219-245, doi:10.1177/1077800405284363. [36]Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3, 77-101, doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved