The Design of Environment Elements Influencing Leisurely Physical Activity in 4 Types of Urban Open Spaces
          
          
          
          DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E254801
           
          Author(s)
          Cuina Zhang*, Yusha Wei, Jiaxin Cao, Yatong Wang
          Affiliation(s)
          College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China
*Corresponding Author
          Abstract
          Environmental elements affecting leisurely physical activity (LPA) in urban open spaces are vital for sustainable healthy cities, yet research on spatial variations remains limited. This study surveyed four space types (Courtyards, Neighborhood Squares (NS), Parks, Campus) via questionnaire, employing Simultaneous Analysis of Several Groups (SASG). Results show: 1) Environmental elements significantly influence LPA across all spaces; 2) Impacts vary spatially: Physical Environment (PE) most affects Courtyards, Facilities most affect NS, Amenities only affect Parks, and Facilities uniquely affect both LPA duration and frequency in Campus; 3) Key design elements and tailored strategies are identified for each space type, demonstrated through four case examples.
          Keywords
          Environment Elements; Leisurely Physical Activity; Influence; Urban Open Space; Design
          References
          [1]Organization W H . Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010. DOI: /entity/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/index.
[2]Guerra J, Jhon J, Lanza K, et al. The availability between recreational facilities and physical activity of US adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2024, 38: 102592.
[3]Amy V. Ries et al. A Quantitative Examination of Parks Characteristics Related to Parks Use and Physical Activity Among Urban Youth. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2009, 45:S64–S70.DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.020
[4]Cutt, H, Giles-Corti, B, Wood, L, Knuiman, M, Burke, V, Barriers and motivators for owners walking their dog: results from qualitative research. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 2008(19):118–124.DOI:10.1071/HE08118
[5]Loo BP, Zhang F. Design of public open space: Site features, playing, and physical activity. Health & Place. 2024 Jan 1; 85: 103149.
[6]Ying Taoyuan、Ying Jun. The impact of the urban Parks built environment on physical activity of the residents: A case study of Hangzhou. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2016 ,223(2): 47-50.
[7]Veitch J, Salmon J, Ball K. Children\"s Perceptions of the Use of Public Open Spaces for Active Free-play. Children\"s Geographies, 2007, 5(4):409-422.DOI: 10.1080/14733280701631874
[8]Kaczynski A T, Potwarka L R, Saelens B E. Association of Park Size, Distance, and Features With Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks. American Journal of Public Health, 2008, 98(8):1451-1456. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2007.129064
[9]Wang Huan, The Influence of Community Built Environment on Leisure Physical Activity of the Elderly from the Perspective of Social Ecology: A Case Study of Baibuting Community in Wuhan. Postgraduate Program of Central China Normal University, 2017.5.
[10]Pereira R, Santos R, Susana Póvoas, et al. Environment perception and leisure-time physical activity in Portuguese high school students. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2018, 10: 224. DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.10.013
[11]Danis A, Sidek S, Yusof S M. Environmental Characteristics Influences on Physical Activity among Overweight Adolescents: Urban Neighbourhood Parks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 153(10):407. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.073
[12]Zhang Cuina, Li Lingling. Construction and application of Evaluation system of daily outdoor leisure sport space. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017(4). DOI: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201510083
[13]Ellaway A, Macintyre S, Bonnefoy X. Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. BMJ 2005; 331: 611–12. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38575.664549.F7.