Cultural Identity and Technological Literacy as Dual Drivers: The Impact of Zhanjiang Nianli Digital Dissemination on the International Competence of Corporate Tech Talents
          
          
          
          DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E254811
           
          Author(s)
          Hanjuan Tang
          Affiliation(s)
          School of Foreign Languages, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
          Abstract
          Amid globalization and China's "Dual Creation" initiative, fostering internationally competent tech talents has become a strategic priority for second-tier cities such as Zhanjiang. This study explores how cultural identity and technological literacy interact to enhance such competence, taking Zhanjiang’s intangible heritage-the “Nianli” festival-as a focal point. We propose that strong local cultural identity, combined with technological proficiency, creates a “dual-driver” effect that boosts professionals’ global readiness. Using a mixed-methods design, we first distributed questionnaires to 250 tech professionals in Zhanjiang to assess correlations among cultural identity, English reading skills, and tech adoption. Subsequently, a quasi-experimental intervention was conducted, wherein an AI-driven intelligent tutoring system (ITS) provided metacognitive reading strategy training integrated with English digital content on Nianli culture (e.g., VR, interactive stories). A control group used conventional English materials. Results showed that the experimental group achieved significant gains not only in reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness but also in cultural confidence and cross-cultural efficacy. This indicates that digitally embedding local culture into skill training enriches learning and strengthens international competence. We propose a “Cultural-Tech Literacy Integration Model,” positing that enabling tech talents to digitally articulate local heritage in global languages effectively transforms culture into human capital-aligning with “Dual Creation” goals.
          Keywords
          International Competence; Cultural Identity; Technological Literacy; Digital Dissemination; Nianli Festival; Intelligent Tutoring System; Metacognitive Training; Dual Creation; Zhanjiang; Corporate Tech Talents
          References
          [1] Deardorff, D. K. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10 (3), 241-266.
[2] Lovitt, C. R. (2010). The global engineer: Using communication and collaboration to create a more just and sustainable world. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
[3] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[4] Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2002). Cultivating a global mindset. The Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1), 116-126.
[5] Kim, Y. Y. (2015). Achieving intercultural competence in practice. In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication.
[6] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
[7] Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
[8] Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., & Mizoguchi, R. (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer.
[9] Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive--developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906.
[10] Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10 (1), 54-69.
[11] Phinney, J. S. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7 (2), 156-176.
[12] Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 (2), 257-285.
[13] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[14] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.