AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 2 No. 8 (ESH 2025) >
Research on the Driving Mechanism of Organizational Support and Psychological Safety on Employee Innovative Behavior under the Background of Digital Transformation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E254814
Author(s)
Peng Guan*
Affiliation(s)
Baise University, Baise, Guangxi, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
As digital transformation continues to progress, employees’ innovative activities increasingly serve as a vital element for firms striving to improve competitiveness and sustain development. This study aims to explore the driving mechanisms of employee innovative behavior in the context of digital transformation, with a focus on the roles of organizational support and psychological safety. Through a systematic review of relevant theoretical literature, this study adopts a theoretical analysis approach to conceptually examine the characteristics of employee innovative behavior, the mechanisms of organizational support and psychological safety, and the impact of digital transformation on organizational behavior from the perspective of organizational behavior. The findings indicate that organizational support can create conditions for employees to implement innovative behaviors by providing resources, guidance, and emotional recognition; psychological safety can reduce employees’ psychological stress and stimulate their willingness to try new approaches and propose innovative ideas; the two factors exhibit complementary and synergistic effects in the context of digital transformation, enhancing the proactivity, creativity, and sustainability of employee innovative behavior. Based on theoretical analysis, this study proposes three core conclusions: organizational support positively drives employee innovative behavior in the context of digital transformation; psychological safety has a positive impact on employee innovative behavior; the combined effect of organizational support and psychological safety can further enhance the level of employee innovative behavior. These conclusions provide a theoretical basis for understanding the intrinsic mechanisms of employee innovative behavior in a digital transformation environment and offer managerial insights for optimizing organizational support and psychological safety.
Keywords
Digital Transformation; Employee Innovative Behavior; Organizational Support; Psychological Safety; Organizational Behavior
References
[1] Liu, Y., & He, Q. (2024). Digital transformation, external financing, and enterprise resource allocation efficiency. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(4), 2321–2335. [2] Bindel Sibassaha, J. L., Pea-Assounga, J. B. B., & Bambi, P. D. R. (2025). Influence of digital transformation on employee innovative behavior: Roles of challenging appraisal, organizational culture support, and transformational leadership style. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1532977. [3] Montani, F., & Staglianò, R. (2022). Innovation in times of pandemic: The moderating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between COVID‐19‐induced job stress and employee innovation. R&D Management, 52(2), 193–205. [4] Ebrahim, Z. B., Ismail, I., & Kassim, E. S. (2023). A conceptual review of the determinants of employee innovative work behavior. Information Management and Business Review, 15(4), 239–257. [5] Li, L., Bai, X., & Zhou, Y. (2023). A social resources perspective of employee innovative behavior and outcomes: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 15(3), 2669. [6] Listyanti, I. N., & Hendarman, A. F. (2023). Knowledge sharing behavior, team climate, and organizational learning culture as predictors of innovative work behavior. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Sciences and Humanities, 7, 34–49. [7] Huu, P. T. (2023). Impact of employee digital competence on the relationship between digital autonomy and innovative work behavior: A systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12), 14193–14222. [8] Su, X., Jiang, X., Lin, W., Xu, A., & Zheng, Q. (2022). Organizational innovative climate and employees’ improvisational behavior: The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Sage Open, 12(4), 21582440221132526. [9] Sun, L. (2019). Perceived organizational support: A literature review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 9(3), 155–175. [10] Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Skorková, Z. (2021). Perceived organizational support and work engagement of first-line managers in healthcare–the mediation role of feedback seeking behavior. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 3109–3123. [11] Hessari, H., Daneshmandi, F., & Nategh, T. (2023). Investigating the effect of technostress on the perceived organizational commitment by mediating role of individual innovation. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.07806. [12] Sapra, J., & Kumar, B. (2020). Inter-relation of psychological safety, courage and vulnerability in the workplace. International Journal of Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(3), 562–567. [13] Kessler, M., Rosca, E., & Arlinghaus, J. (2024). Risk management behaviour in digital factories: The influence of technology and task uncertainty on managerial risk responses. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(2), 297–314. [14] Hao, Q., Zhang, B., Shi, Y., & Yang, Q. (2022). How trust in coworkers fosters knowledge sharing in virtual teams? A multilevel moderated mediation model of psychological safety, team virtuality, and self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899142. [15] Nadeem, K., Wong, S. I., Za, S., & Venditti, M. (2024). Digital transformation and Industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations. Technology in Society, 76, 102434. [16] Rodriguez‐Lluesma, C., García‐Ruiz, P., & Pinto‐Garay, J. (2021). The digital transformation of work: A relational view. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 30(1), 157–167.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved