Research on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the High-Quality Development of Manufacturing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E264206
Author(s)
Haoliang He
Affiliation(s)
School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation system encompassing five dimensions is constructed in this paper using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces spanning 2012 to 2023. This system serves as the basis for examining whether artificial intelligence can empower the high-quality development of China's manufacturing sector. R&D capability, green development, openness, economic efficiency, and industrial coordination. Employing the two-way fixed effects model, instrumental variable method, mediation effect model, and heterogeneity tests, the study finds that AI significantly promotes the high-quality development of manufacturing. This conclusion remains robust after addressing endogeneity. AI drives manufacturing development through two pathways: promoting technological innovation and optimizing human capital structure. The empowering effect exhibits significant heterogeneity, with the strongest effect in the eastern region. The effect is significant in coastal areas but not in inland areas, and regions with weak digital infrastructure show higher marginal returns. Based on these findings, this paper proposes differentiated regional AI development strategies, a technology-talent collaborative support system, and coordinated advancement of new digital infrastructure to facilitate the transformation of China’s manufacturing industry from a manufacturing giant to a manufacturing powerhouse.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Manufacturing; High-Quality Development; Technological Innovation; Human Capital
References
[1]Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753-768.
[2]Chen, Y. Y., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. H. (2022). Industrial robots and the spatial allocation of labor. Economic Research Journal, 57(1), 172-188.
[3]Goos, M. (2015). Employment growth in Europe: The roles of innovation, local job multipliers and institutions. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series, No. 15-10.
[4]Zeira, J. (1998). Workers, machines, and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1091-1117.
[5]Lyu, Y., Gu, W., & Bao, Q. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the participation of Chinese enterprises in global value chain division of labor. China Industrial Economics, (5), 80-98.
[6]Liu, C. K., & Lin, M. Y. (2023). Statistical measurement and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of manufacturing high-quality development level. Contemporary Economic Management, 45(8), 56-68.
[7]Shan, C. X., Li, Q., & Ding, L. (2023). Intellectual property protection, innovation drive and manufacturing high-quality development: An analysis of moderated mediation effect. Economic Issues, (2), 51-59.
[8]Yang, R. F., & Zheng, Y. Y. (2022). Human capital structure and high-quality development of manufacturing industry: Impact mechanism and empirical test. Reform of Economic System, (4), 112-119.
[9]Zhu, G. P., & Wang, K. (2024). AI application and green innovation of manufacturing enterprises. Industrial Technology & Economy, 43(9), 73-81.
[10]Zhang, K. Y., Zhuang, Z. W., & Han, F. (2022). Domestic mega-market, AI application and quality upgrading of manufacturing export products. Economic Review, (7), 1-12+13.