AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 3 No. 2 (ESH 2026) >
The Relationship Between Corporate ESG Performance and Innovation Input Intensity In China: An Analysis Based on the Industrial Heterogeneity of High-Tech Enterprises
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E264216
Author(s)
Dihan Zheng*
Affiliation(s)
School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
Based on the stakeholder theory and competitive strategy theory, this paper takes the financial data of Chinese A-share listed companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange of China from 2008 to 2024 as the research sample, and empirically examines the relationship between corporate ESG performance and innovation input intensity(IPI) by adopting the multiple linear regression method. The results show that good ESG performance can significantly promote the improvement of corporate innovation input intensity. From the perspective of industrial heterogeneity, the positive impact of ESG performance on innovation input intensity is more prominent in high-tech enterprises. This study optimizes the measurement index of innovation input and explores the industry heterogeneity of the impact of ESG performance, which enriches the research on the economic consequences of corporate ESG performance and provides practical references for enterprises to improve ESG performance and increase innovation investment.
Keywords
ESG Performance; Innovation Input Intensity; High-Tech Enterprises; Competitive Strategy; Industrial Heterogeneity
References
[1]Chomachaei F ,Kaffash S ,Ertugrul M .Sustainability and financial performance: How efficiency mediates the ESG-financial performance relationship in the Airline industry.Journal of Air Transport Management,2026,133102976-102976. [2]Miao X ,Nie Z .Credit risk early warning for listed companies based on ESG information: evidence from China.Applied Economics Letters,2026,33(5):637-640. [3]Chaoqi L .From Passive Compliance to Active Value Creation - How Can ESG Become a Core Element of Corporate Competitiveness.SHS Web of Conferences,2025,22503036-03036. [4]Wang Y ,Shah H M ,Wang Y , et al.Standardized Sustainability Reporting, ESG Performance, and Market-Based Valuation in Chinese Listed Firms.Sustainability,2026,18(2):920-920. [5]Wu J ,Zheng S ,Tang Y .Does ESG Disclosure Help Improve Intangible Capital? Evidence From A-Share Listed Companies.Frontiers in Environmental Science,2022,10. [6]Zhu H P ,Cao B ,Wei W , et al.How does public environmental concern affect ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese A-shares listed firms.Sustainable Futures,2025,10101277-101277. [7]Park K .CSR fit with CEO image: Unpacking its influence on stakeholder engagement and authenticity perception.Journal of Marketing Communications,2026,32(1):40-64. [8]Ma X ,Zhang Y .How do Multinationals Impact China's Technology? The Role of Quid Pro Quo Policy and Technology Spillovers.International Economic Review,2025,66(5):1933-1956. [9]Sui Y .Research on the Application of Smart Finance in the Financial Industry.Modern Economics & Management Forum,2025,6(4). [10]Chan Y E .Moral Signaling in Startups: How ESG Claims Shape Stakeholder Judgments and Ethical Legitimacy.Journal of Business Ethics,2025,203(2):1-15.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved