AEPH
Home > Economic Society and Humanities > Vol. 3 No. 4 (ESH 2026) >
A Comparative Study of the Generative Mechanisms of Gui and Laurel as Mythic Metaphors in Classical Chinese and English Poetry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E264411
Author(s)
Yuanche Qiu
Affiliation(s)
Wusheng Institution, Liaoning University, Liaoyang, Liaoning, China
Abstract
Once gui and laurel enter poetry, they cease to be mere botanical referents. Their comparability lies less in botany than in a shared movement from natural object to mythically charged poetic sign. This article therefore asks not what the two images mean in the abstract, but how those meanings are produced, transmitted, and stabilized in different traditions. In English poetry, laurel develops along a relatively focused line from the myth of Daphne to the laurel crown and then to poetic self-fashioning. In Chinese poetry, gui grows through the overlapping of moon-palace myth, the trope of breaking the cassia branch, and later lyric practice. Read in this way, the contrast is not merely between one symbol and another, but between two different processes by which poetic images are culturally formed. The argument helps shift Sino-English comparison of poetic imagery from symbolic cataloguing to the analysis of generative mechanism.
Keywords
Gui; Laurel; Mythic Metaphor; Generative Mechanism; Classical Chinese and English Poetry
References
[1] Francese, Christopher. “Daphne, Honor, and Aetiological Action in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.” Classical World 97, no. 2 (2004): 153-157. [2] Freccero, John. “The Fig Tree and the Laurel: Petrarch’s Poetics.” Diacritics 5, no. 1 (1975): 34-40. [3] Mann, Nicholas. “From Laurel to Fig: Petrarch and the Structures of the Self.” In Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 105, 17-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. [4] Gragnolati, Manuele, and Francesca Southerden. “Openness and Intensity: Petrarch’s Becoming Laurel in Rvf 23 and Rvf 228.” In Possibilities of Lyric: Reading Petrarch in Dialogue, 45-63. Berlin: ICI Berlin Press, 2020. [5] Hooper, Laurence E. “Exile and Petrarch’s Reinvention of Authorship.” Renaissance Quarterly 69, no. 4 (2016): 1217-1256. [6] Duan, Yifan, and Xianrong Wang. “From the Gui Tablet to the Gui Tree: A New Study of the Cassia in the Moon and the Origin and Evolution of Gui Culture.” Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 11, no. 2 (2011): 39-43. [7] Dong, Lina. A Study of Osmanthus Imagery in Chinese Literature. Master's thesis, Nanjing Normal University, 2006. [8] Xie, Yuren. “A Comparison of Gui Imagery in Chinese and Western Traditions.” Appreciation of Masterpieces, no. 15 (2022): 179-181. [9] Eberhard, Wolfram. Dictionary of Chinese Symbols: Hidden Symbols in Chinese Life and Thought. London: Routledge, 1988. [10] Hu, Qinbao. “On Gui Imagery in Tang Poetry.” Journal of Southern Vocational Education, no. 4 (2011): 88-93. [11] Zhong, Zheng. A Study of Gui Imagery in Song-Dynasty Literature. Master's thesis, Shandong University, 2021. [12] Li, Xiaoru. A Study of Osmanthus Poetry in the Song Dynasty. Master's thesis, Anhui Normal University, 2024.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved