The Changes of Maritime Security Strategy in the Trump 2.0 Era and Its Impacts on the Asia-Pacific Region
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E264614
Author(s)
Zhangzhong Huang, Nadja Furlan Stante*
Affiliation(s)
ZRS (Science and Research Centre) Koper Garibaldijeva I, SI-6000, Koper, Slovenia
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to explore the changes of maritime security strategy in the Trump 2.0 era and its multi-dimensional impacts on the Asia-Pacific region, so as to fill the research gap in the dynamic adjustment of U.S. maritime strategy and its regional spillover effects. Adopting the methods of literature research, comparative analysis and case study, this paper first combs the core connotation of Trump 2.0’s maritime security strategy, compares its differences from the maritime strategy in the Trump 1.0 era and the Biden administration, then analyzes the driving factors of the strategic changes from the perspectives of domestic politics, geopolitical pattern and global maritime competition, and finally explores the impacts of the changes on the Asia-Pacific maritime security pattern, regional national relations and international maritime rules. The results show that the maritime security strategy in the Trump 2.0 era presents the characteristics of "Monroe Doctrine Trump Corollary" orientation, hegemony reshaping, and adjusted ally responsibilities, which not only intensifies geopolitical competition in the Asia-Pacific maritime region and disrupts regional security stability, but also challenges the existing international maritime order, while forcing regional countries to adjust their maritime security strategies to respond. The research provides a theoretical reference for understanding the evolution of U.S. maritime strategy and the complex changes in the Asia-Pacific maritime security situation.
Keywords
Trump 2.0 Era; Maritime Security Strategy; Asia-Pacific Region; Geopolitical Competition; Pacific Deterrence Initiative
References
[1] Li Haidong. U.S. Maritime Hegemony and Port Layout Strategy in the Indo-Pacific Region[J]. Journal of International Studies, 2026, (2): 45-58.
[2] Zhang Junshe. The Impact of U.S. Maritime Strategy Adjustment on the Asia-Pacific Security Pattern[J]. Naval Military Studies, 2025, (5): 67-79.
[3] Shi Yubing. The Entry into Force of the New Global Maritime Governance Agreement and the Evolution of International Maritime Rules[J]. Chinese Journal of International Law, 2026, (1): 89-102.
[4] Wang Antao. China’s Participation in Global Maritime Governance and Its Significance[J]. Journal of Ocean Development and Management, 2025, (12): 34-46.
[5] Gou Haibo. The New Global Maritime Governance Agreement: A Milestone in International Maritime Law[J]. World Economics and Politics, 2026, (3): 112-125.
[6] Chen Bin. The Characteristics and Impacts of the New Global Maritime Governance Agreement[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2025, (10): 78-89.
[7] Tang Dongmei. Deep-Sea Genetic Resources and the Practice of Global Maritime Governance[J]. Journal of Chinese Oceanography, 2026, (4): 56-68.
[8] Zhang Xinjun. China’s Role in the Evolution of the International Maritime Order[J]. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2025, (8): 98-110.
[9] Liu Yang. Multilateralism and the Development of International Maritime Rules[J]. Journal of International Law, 2026, (2): 76-88.
[10] Holmes J. Naval Power Ranking in the Indo-Pacific Region and Its Geopolitical Implications[J]. Journal of Naval War College, 2026, (1): 32-45.
[11] Li Haidong. The Geopolitical Implications of the U.S.-Japan-India-Australia Quadrilateral Mechanism’s Maritime Security Cooperation[J]. Contemporary International Relations, 2025, (7): 56-69.