Social Support and Adolescents' Digital Reading Literacy: The Moderating Role of Information Literacy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/E264801
Author(s)
Junyao Zhang, Wenyan Zhang*
Affiliation(s)
School of Economics, Management and Law, Changchun Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Digital reading literacy helps adolescents learn in digital settings, but its social basis is still unclear. Relevant studies of digital reading often treat social support as a single variable, whereas this can hide the different effects of emotional, instrumental, informational, and peer support. In this study, we examined these four forms of support in relation to digital reading literacy among 1,052 middle school students from four county-level schools in Jilin Province, China. We also tested whether information literacy changes these different relationships. Structural equation modelling revealed that the researched four types of support have positive relationship with digital reading literacy. Peer support had the largest direct effect. Information literacy enhances the relationship between instrumental use and digital reading literacy, as well as between peer support and digital reading literacy. These results reveal that students may benefit more from practical and peer support when they can find, assess, and use information in digital context. The study also shows why social support should be examined by different types in county-level schools.
Keywords
Digital Reading Literacy; Information Literacy; Social Support; Middle School Students
References
[1] Timotheou, S.; Miliou, O.; Dimitriadis, Y.; Sobrino, S.V.; Giannoutsou, N.; Cachia, R.; et al. Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: a literature review. Educ Inf Technol 2023, 28, 6695–6726, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8.
[2] Turner, K.H.; Jolls, T.; Hagerman, M.S.; O’Byrne, W.; Hicks, T.; Eisenstock, B.; et al. Developing digital and media literacies in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2017, 140, S122–126, doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758P.
[3] Barzillai, M.; Thomson, J.M.; Schroeder, S.; van den Broek, P.W., Eds. Learning to Read in a Digital World; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018.
[4] Barbot, B.; Kaufman, J.C. PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment: opportunities, challenges, and cautions. J Creat Behav 2025, 59, e70003, doi:10.1002/jocb.70003.
[5] İdil, Ş.; Gülen, S.; Dönmez, İ. What should we understand from PISA 2022 results? J STEAM Educ 2024, 7, 1–9, doi:10.55290/steam.1415261.
[6] Mark, W.; Tamara, T. Digital divides and social inclusion. In Handbook of Writing, Literacies, and Education in Digital Cultures, 1st ed.; Mills, K.A.; Stornaiuolo, A.; Smith, A.; Zacher Pandya, J., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 62–63.
[7] Robinson, L.; Cotten, S.R.; Ono, H.; Quan-Haase, A.; Mesch, G.; Chen, W.; et al. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Inf, Commun Soc 2015, 18, 569–582, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.
[8] Ren, Y. Rural China staggering towards the digital era: evolution and restructuring. Land 2023, 12, 1416, doi: 10.3390/land12071416.
[9] Yang, T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H. Addressing territorial digital divide through digital policy: lessons from China’s national comprehensive big data pilot zones. Inf Technol Dev 2025, 31, 577–603, doi:10.1080/02681102.2024.2402984.
[10] Hasan, M.R.; Mason, K.; Egbury, G.; Brown, E.L.; Rogers, W.; Harrison, A.; et al. Exploring meta-cognitive resilience and psycho-social well-being among Bangladeshi university students during COVID-19: a mixed-methods primary study of adaptive cognitive strategies. Int J Adv Multidiscip Res Stud 2025, 5, 542–553, doi:10.62225/2583049X.2025.5.1.3689.
[11] Crawford, J.; Allen, K.A.; Pani, B.; Cowling, M. When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. Stud High Educ 2024, 49, 883–897, doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2326956.
[12] Stanton-Salazar, R.D.; Spina, S.U. Adolescent peer networks as a context for social and emotional support. Youth Soc 2005, 36, 379–417, doi: 10.1177/0044118X04267814.
[13] Wentzel, K.R.; Russell, S.; Baker, S. Emotional support and expectations from parents, teachers, and peers predict adolescent competence at school. J Educ Psychol 2016, 108, 242–255, doi: 10.1037/edu0000049.
[14] Malecki, C.K.; Demaray, M.K. What type of support do they need? Investigating student adjustment as related to emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support. Sch Psychol Q 2003, 18, 231–252, doi:10.1521/scpq.18.3.231.22576.
[15] Bradshaw, J.; Siddiqui, N.; Greenfield, D.; Sharma, A. Kindness, listening, and connection: patient and clinician key requirements for emotional support in chronic and complex care. J Patient Exp 2022, 9, 23743735221092627, doi: 10.1177/23743735221092627.
[16] Scott, R.A.; Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J.; Gardner, A.A.; Hawes, T.; Modecki, K.L.; Duffy, A.L.; et al. Daily use of digital technologies to feel better: adolescents’ digital emotion regulation, emotions, loneliness, and recovery, considering prior emotional problems. J Adolesc 2024, 96, 539–550, doi:10.1002/jad.12259.
[17] Ivey, G.; Johnston, P. Teens Choosing to Read: Fostering Social, Emotional, and Intellectual Growth through Books; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–141.
[18] Li, J.; Deng, H.; Li, J. The impact of village heads’ educational levels on adolescent academic performance: evidence from rural China. PLOS One 2025, 20, e0315822, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315822.
[19] Kong, Q.; Yang, L. Digital divide in rural education in Chinese schools: exploring issues and opportunities. Eur J Educ 2026, 61, e70436, doi:10.1111/ejed.70436.
[20] Rinaldi, A.M. A complete framework to manage multimedia ontologies in digital ecosystems. Int J Bus Process Integr Manag 2015, 7, 274, doi:10.1504/IJBPIM.2015.073660.
[21] Zhang, L. The impact of internet age network information dissemination on adolescents. Interdiscip Humanit Commun Stud 2025, 1, doi: 10.61173/174e7940
[22] Rajapakse, N. Amartya Sen’s capability approach and education: enhancing social justice. Rev LISA/LISA E-J 2016, XIV, doi:10.4000/lisa.8913.
[23] Alshammari, S.H.; Alkhwaldi, A.F. An integrated approach using social support theory and technology acceptance model to investigate the sustainable use of digital learning technologies. Sci Rep 2025, 15, 342, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83450-z.
[24] Hamedi F, Pashaei Fakhri K, Adelzadeh P. A psychoanalytic study of two Iranian novels based on Albert Banduras theory of cognitive-social learning. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education. 2021 Nov; 4(4). doi:10.22034/ijce.2021.251165.1224
[25] Cyranowski, J.M.; Zill, N.; Bode, R.; Butt, Z.; Kelly, M.A.R.; Pilkonis, P.A.; et al. Assessing social support, companionship, and distress: national institute of health (NIH) toolbox adult social relationship scales. Health Psychol 2013, 32, 293–301, doi: 10.1037/a0028586.
[26] Golaszewski, N.M.; Bartholomew, J.B. The development of the physical activity and social support scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2019, 41, 215–229, doi:10.1123/jsep.2018-0234.