AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 2 No. 1 (HEP 2025) >
Evolution of Education: The Introduction of AI Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251121
Author(s)
Junmu Ding1,*, Yuxuan Zhang2
Affiliation(s)
1Baoshan University, Yunnan, China, 2Zhiyuan Primary School of Baoshan, Yunnan, China, *Corresponding Author.
Abstract
Following the increasing digitalization of the world, AI technology is now more advanced than ever, to the point where it is more intertwined with our lives than we think it is. Originating from a simple hypothetical question by Alan Turing in the 1950s, it has advanced rapidly to become useful systems and programs in most fields. Undoubtedly, it has also made its way into the educational field in the form of educational tools meant to assist pedagogy and learning. However, as it is still considered a relatively new type of technology with much room for improvement. As such, there have been multiple reviews of AIEd (Artificial Intelligence in Education). Thus, a semi-systematic review of various literature work has been carried out in this paper in hopes of providing insight regarding how the introduction and subsequent integration of AI technology in education has caused the educational field to evolve in potentially new directions. The publication dates of works gathered range from 1960 to 2024 for a more complete and well-rounded analysis of the main trends AIEd brought about for educators and learners alike. The selected works for review are then split into decades for a more detailed analysis and the main direction of evolution of evolution is noted for each decade. The changes and differences in evolution direction are also noted through comparison.
Keywords
AI in Education (AIEd); Educational Evolution; Semi-Systematic Review; Technology Integration
References
[1] Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541. [2]Alzahrani, A. K. D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2024). Problematic Gaming and Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01338-5. [3]Bellas, F., Naya-Varela, M., Mallo, A., & Paz-Lopez, A. (2024). Education in the AI era: a long-term classroom technology based on intelligent robotics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03953-y. [4]Bitzer, D., Braunfeld, P., & Lichtenberger, W. (1961). PLATO: An Automatic Teaching Device. IRE Transactions on Education, 4(4), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.1961.4322215. [5]Carbonell, J. (1970). AI in CAI: An Artificial-Intelligence Approach to Computer-Assisted Instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems, 11(4), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmms.1970.299942. [6]Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8. [7]Dongming Xu, Huaiqing Wang (2006). Intelligent agent supported personalization for virtual learning environments, Decision Support Systems, Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 825-843, ISSN 0167-9236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.033. [8]Estevez, J., Garate, G., & Grana, M. (2019). Gentle Introduction to Artificial Intelligence for High-School Students Using Scratch. IEEE Access, 7, 179027-179036. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2956136. [9]Henry, J., Hernalesteen, A., & Collard, A.-S. (2021). Teaching Artificial Intelligence to K-12 Through a Role-Playing Game Questioning the Intelligence Concept. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00733-7. [10]John Seely Brown and Richard R. Burton (1974). SOPHIE: a pragmatic use of artificial intelligence in CAI. In Proceedings of the 1974 annual ACM conference - Volume 2 (ACM '74). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1145/1408800.1408855. [11]Logo Foundation, 2024. What Is Logo? https://el.media.mit.edu/logo-foundation/what_is_logo/history.html (accessed 8th November 2024). [12]Mguidich, H., Zoudji, B., & Khacharem, A. (2023). Does imagination enhance learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(3), 1943-1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00754-w. [13]Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 639-653. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2597. [14]Tedre, M., Toivonen, T., Kahila, J., Vartiainen, H., Valtonen, T., Jormanainen, I., & Pears, A. (2021). Teaching Machine Learning in K-12 Classroom: Pedagogical and Technological Trajectories for Artificial Intelligence Education. IEEE Access, 9, 110558-110572. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3097962. [15]Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167. [16]Zhai, Xiaoming, ChatGPT and AI: The Game Changer for Education (March 15, 2023). Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT: Reforming Education on Five Aspects. Shanghai Education. 16-17., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4389098
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved