AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 2 No. 11 (HEP 2025) >
Framework Construction and Enhancement Pathways of Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Liberal Arts Teachers in Higher Education under the Background of New Liberal Arts Initiative
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251B08
Author(s)
Shufang Zhao, Fei Xia, Baolong Li*
Affiliation(s)
Suqian University, Suqian, Jiangsu, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the profound transformations in disciplinary development logic and talent cultivation paradigms driven by the construction of New Liberal Arts, university liberal arts teachers have been reshaped into compound talent cultivators, learning process enablers, and social value constructors. Their AI literacy directly determines the depth and effectiveness of New Liberal Arts construction. To address this, based on a systematic review of existing research, this paper clearly defines the core connotation of AI literacy for university liberal arts teachers, systematically analyzes its constituent elements, and constructs a two-level indicator system framework. Meanwhile, considering the practical challenges faced by these teachers in improving AI literacy—such as insufficient knowledge and skill reserves, difficulties in integrating teaching content with AI technologies, and inadequate support from practical guarantee conditions—this paper further proposes a trinity improvement pathway of "philosophy guidance- competence cultivation - ecological support." The research conclusions provide theoretical guidance and practical references for the systematic improvement of teachers' AI literacy and the realization of the New Liberal Arts construction goal of "technology empowering liberal arts innovation and liberal arts guiding technology for good."
Keywords
New Liberal Arts Construction; AI Literacy; Technology-Empowered Teaching; University Liberal Arts Teachers; Construction of Literacy Framework
References
[1] Yu J X. Promoting the construction of New Liberal Arts with systematic thinking. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(4): 72-78. [2] Quan P P, Duan Y, Cui Y Q. The "newness" and "way" of liberal arts: Reflections on the construction of New Liberal Arts. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 27(1): 280-290. [3] Zhang F G. The construction of New Liberal Arts should highlight humanistic spirit and literary value. Exploration and Free Views, 2022(9): 9-12. [4] UNESCO. AI competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO, 2024: 22-29. [5] Kandlhofer M, Steinbauer G, Hirschmugl-Gaisch S, et al. Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university//2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 1-9. [6] Dai Y, et al. Promoting students' well-being by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age. Sustainability, 2020, 12(16): 6597. [7] Li H B, Yuan M Y, Wang H Y. The driving force and new guidelines of "artificial intelligence + education": Analysis and reflection on UNESCO's report "Artificial Intelligence in Education". Journal of Distance Education, 2019(4): 3-12. [8] Xu Y L, Li D N. Prospect of vocational education under the background of digital age: Analysis of European Union's "Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027)" //Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Internet, Education and Information Technology (IEIT). Hangzhou: IEEE, 2021: 164-166. [9] UNESCO. Guidance for generative artificial intelligence in education and research. Paris: UNESCO, 2023: 20-24. [10]Younis B. Effectiveness of a professional development program based on the instructional design framework for AI literacy in developing AI literacy skills among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 2024(6): 1-17. [11]Zhang S, Diao J. What qualities do teachers need in the era of artificial intelligence: Analysis based on international experience. STEM Education Review, 2024, 2(3): 1-9. [12]Luo M N, Yin L, Zhao C G. International research status, hotspots and trends of teachers' AI literacy: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Educational Science Research, 2024(9): 73-81. [13]Long D, Magerko B. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations //Bernhaupt R, Mueller F F. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 1-16. [14]Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D. Evidencebased Development of an Instrument for the Assessment of Teachers' Self-perceptions of Their Artificial Intelligence Competence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024, (9):1-19. [15]Li Y, Sun L Y, Jiang Q Y. AI literacy of university teachers and its improvement strategies. Open Education Research, 2025, 31(1): 23-33. [16]Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, Holstein K, et al. Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2021(3): 504-526. [17]Zhao L, Wu X, Luo H. Developing AI literacy for primary and middle school teachers in China: Based on a structural equation modeling analysis. Sustainability, 2022, 14(21): 14549. [18]Ayanwale M A, Adelana O P, Molefi R R. Examining artificial intelligence literacy among preservice teachers for future classrooms . Computers and Education Open, 2024, 6: 100179 [19]Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2019(1): 389-399. [20]Ng D T K, Leung J K L, Chu S K W, et al. Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review . Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 2: 100041.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved