AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 2 No. 12 (HEP 2025) >
Exploration of Teaching Reform in Applied Undergraduate Courses Driven by Generative AI: Taking the Course of “IoT Machine Vision” as an Example
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251C03
Author(s)
Yingyi Duan1, Xiaochen Zhang1, Yiran Tao2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Guangdong University of Science and Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, China 2The Education University of Hong Kong, HongKong, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
Addressing the key challenges in the teaching of engineering courses in applied undergraduate universities, including high entry barriers, difficult engineering practice, and weak innovation ability, this paper takes the IoT Machine Vision course as the case study, proposes a new model of teaching reform based on the AIGC+CDIO concept. This model integrates Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools into the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) process. Through conducting an empirical study on the teaching project of Intelligent Detection of Safety Helmet Wearing at Construction Sites, which indicates that, this model effectively lowers the technical barrier to coding. Students can transfer their focus from low-level code debugging to algorithm logic design and engineering applications. This model substantially enhances students’ competency to solve complex engineering challenges and cultivate their digital literacy.
Keywords
Generative AI; Internet of Things Engineering; Machine Vision; CDIO; Teaching Reform; Safety Helmet Detection
References
[1] Qadir J. Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), IEEE, 2023: 1-9. [2] Yu Lu, Jinglei Yu, Peng Chen, et al. Educational Applications and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of the ChatGPT System. China Journal of Distance Education, 2023, 43(4): 24-31. [3] Johri A, Katz A, Qadir J, Hingle A. Generative artificial intelligence and engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2023, 112(4): 787-795. [4] Shunjie Chang, Shuya Hao. The Future Landscape, Potential Risks, and Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration in Higher Education. Modern Educational Management, 2023(11): 1-12. [5] Štuikys V, Burbaitė R, Binkis M, et al. Developing problem-solving skills to support sustainability in STEM education using generative AI tools. Sustainability, 2025, 17(15): 6935. [6] Leilei Guo. Generative Artificial Intelligence Driven Educational Change: Mechanisms, Risks, and Responses—Taking DeepSeek as an Example. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2025,13(03):38-47. [7] Ovi J A, et al. Assessing Student Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence across Engineering Education (Preprint). arXiv:2503.04696, 2025. [Accepted for presentation at ASEE 2025 Annual Conference]. [8] Youmei Wang, Dan Wang, Weiyi Liang. Ethical Risks and Risk Avoidance of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Applications. Open Education Research, 2023, 29(2): 26-33. [9] Yu Lu, Jinglei Yu, Penghe Chen, Shengquan Yu, et al. Research and Prospect on the Educational Applications of Large Multimodal Models. Audio-Visual Education Research, 2023, 44(6): 38-44. [10] Batista J, Mesquita A, Carnaz G. Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review. Information, 2024, 15(11): 676.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved