Evaluation and Enhancement Strategies of Geomorphology Experimental Teaching Based on CIPP Model: A Case Study of Jiaying University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251C22
Author(s)
Lina Zhang, Zhicheng Dong*, Hong Li
Affiliation(s)
School of Geographic Sciences and Tourism, Jiaying University, Meizhou, Guangdong, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study developed and operationalized a CIPP-based evaluation framework to assess geomorphology experimental teaching at Jiaying University. Integrating Delphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and expert survey, a four-dimensional indicator system comprising 4 1st-level, 10 2nd-level, and 20 3rd-level indicators was constructed with high reliability and expert consensus. The overall evaluation score (95.34) indicates generally high instructional quality. However, a systemic gap was identified: Results and Effectiveness scored lowest across all dimensions, with five 3rd-level indicators, related to instructional reflection, student feedback, and scholarly output, falling markedly below the mean. This reveals a critical disconnect between teaching execution and tangible educational outcomes. To address this gap, a four-dimensional enhancement framework is proposed. Its core strategies include revitalizing experimental materials, embedding regional geomorphic contexts, adopting scaffolded supervision supported by AI-enabled feedback, and most critically institutionalizing an OBE-aligned closed-loop feedback mechanism that recursively links teaching execution to curricular improvement and scholarly valorization. This study extends the applicability of the CIPP model to geoscience education and offers a replicable, diagnostics-driven blueprint for pedagogical enhancement.
Keywords
CIPP Model; Evaluation; Enhancement Strategies; Geomorphology Experimental Teaching; Case Study
References
[1] Jiang Huixian and Chen Xin. Design and Applied Research of Virtual Geography Experiment System Based on Coastal Topography Cognition. 2021 16th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2021, 592-597.
[2] Janis Fögele, Laura Luber, Rainer Mehren. Types of student teachers between theory and practice in the subject of geography: reconstructing orientations using the example of a seminar on experiments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 2020, 44(2): 310-333.
[3] David T. Graham and Jane Mcneil. Using the Internet as Part of Directed Learning in Social Geography: Developing Web pages as an introduction to local social geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1999, 23(2): 181-194.
[4] Audrey C. Rule, Lewis E. Graham, Martha Harris. Learning Landform Vocabulary through Different Methods: Object Boxes, Sand and Dough Creations, or Puppet Plays. Journal of Geoscience Education, 2006, 54: 515-525.
[5] Luft Edward R. Use of Microscale Landforms to Teach Introductory Physical Geography: Planning a Local Field Exercise. Journal of Geography, 1990, 89: 130-133.
[6] Zhang Ziyang, Wu Dafang, Zhou Xiaoying, et al. Evaluation and analysis of teaching practice of Territorial Spatial Planning course in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on CIPP model. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 44(2): 78-85.
[7] Daniel L. Stufflebeam. A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory into practice, 1996, 5(3), 121-133.
[8] M. Rizal Fathoni and Muhammad Nursa'ban. Evaluation of teacher readiness in geography lesson planning at state senior high schools in Yogyakarta City for the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. Geomedia: Majalah Ilmiah dan Informasi Kegeografian, 2025, 23(1): 33-45.
[9] Waode Yunia Silviariza, Sumarmi, Sugeng Utaya. Development of evaluation instruments to measure the quality of spatial problem based learning (SPBL): CIPP framework. International Journal of Instruction, 2023, 16(2): 413-436.
[10]Rosa María Ruiz-Pedrosa, Paola Coratza, Vittoria Vandelli, et al. Assessment of the Didactic Potential of Geomorphosites: A Study Case in Spain and Italy. Sustainability, 2025, 17(22): 9984.
[11]Segoni Samuele. Who Wants to Be a Geomorphologist? Gamification in a BSc Teaching Course. Geosciences, 2023, 13(11): 322.
[12]He Li, Liang Sun, Seongnyeon Kim. Effects of Customized Generative AI on Student Engagement and Emotions in Visual Communication Design Education: Implications for Sustainable Integration. Sustainability, 2025, 17(22): 9963.
[13]Aizhan, Marek Miłosz, Gulmira Bekmanova. The Digital Transformation of Higher Education in the Context of an AI-Driven Future. Sustainability, 2025, 17(22): 9927.
[14]Zhanyong Qi, Die Li, Yiting Kang. Research on the Construction and Application of a Quality Evaluation Index System for the Independent Cultivation of Top-Tier Innovative Talents in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 4: 113-133.
[15]Yan Jing, Shuwang Chang. Building a Student-Centered Whole-Process Assessment System for the Signals and Systems Course. Journal of Higher Education, 2024, 10(19): 21-24.
[16]Wang Shuyi. Study on Teaching Quality Monitoring System of Applied Colleges and Universities Based on OBE Concepts. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2025, 13(3): 744-771.