Curriculum Reform and Innovation of E-Commerce Programs in Higher Education under the Empowerment of Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251A17
Author(s)
Guangying Wang*, Lijuan Xu
Affiliation(s)
School of International Business, Qingdao Huanghai University, Qingdao, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
Guided by smart education, technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data are increasingly integrated into university teaching, opening up new directions for instructional reform. As a key field for cultivating interdisciplinary talent, the e-commerce major must address issues such as fragmented curricula, homogeneous teaching formats, weak practical training, and outdated evaluation practices. This paper proposes a “teacher—student—machine” collaborative framework that utilizes intelligent tools, restructures teaching content, builds ubiquitous smart learning environments, and strengthens evaluation mechanisms. The resulting “data-driven—adaptive—competence—oriented” model offers a feasible pathway for promoting the smart transformation and talent cultivation innovation in e-commerce education.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; AI Empowerment; Teaching Reform; Higher Education; E-Commerce
References
[1]Koshanova D, Zakirova A, Tynyshkali A. Development of a personalised learning pathway on the basis of a competency-based approach. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 2024, 32(124): e0244464.
[2]Kozanitis A, Nenciovici L. Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education, 2023, 86(6): 1377-1394.
[3]Komljenovic J, Sellar S, Birch K. Turning universities into data-driven organisations: Seven dimensions of change. Higher Education, 2025, 89(5): 1369-1386.
[4]Alamri H A, Watson S, Watson W. Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. TechTrends, 2021, 65(1): 62-78.
[5]Pantzos P, Gumaelius L, Buckley J, Pears A. Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2023, 48(1): 91-109.
[6]Abbas T. Ethical implications of AI in modern education: Balancing innovation and responsibility. Social Sciences Spectrum, 2023, 2(1): 51-57.
[7]Dai Z, Yang Y, Chen Z, Wang L, Zhao L, Zhu X, Xiong J. The role of project-based learning with activity theory in teaching effectiveness: Evidence from the internet of things course. Education and Information Technologies, 2025, 30(4): 4717-4749.
[8]Yan Z, Qianjun T. Integrating AI-generated content tools in higher education: a comparative analysis of interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 25802.
[9]Navas Bonilla C D R, Viñan Carrasco L M, Gaibor Pupiales J C, Murillo Noriega D E. The future of education: A systematic literature review of self-directed learning with AI. Future Internet, 2025, 17(8): 366.
[10]Kim J, Lee H, Cho Y H. Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 2022, 27(5): 6069-6104.
[11]Wood J. A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021, 46(8): 1173-1190.
[12]İnanç A S, Çötok N A, Çötok T. Internal and External Factors Shaping Motivation in AI-Based Language Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 2025, 17(2): 783-817.
[13]Zamiri M, Esmaeili A. Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 2024, 14(1): 17.
[14]Chen B, Chang Y H, Ouyang F, Zhou W. Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 2018, 37: 21-30.