AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 2 No. 5 (HEP 2025) >
An Investigation into the Application of Blended Learning in the Intercultural Business Communication Course
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H251501
Author(s)
Xiaoying Yan*
Affiliation(s)
School of Foreign Languages, Guangxi Minzu Normal University, Chongzuo, Guangxi, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
With the emergence of educational platforms such as Xuexitong, the blended learning model has gradually gained popularity in universities and colleges of China. This paper describes and illustrates the application of the blended learning model into the course of Intercultural Business Communication at Guangxi Minzu Normal University from the border of Southern China. It consists of implementation of blended learning model into this course, the author’s findings, corresponding adjustments, and teaching assessments, which aims to provide a reference for teaching Intercultural Communication and other cultural courses for English majors at average undergraduate institutions.
Keywords
Blended Learning; Cultural Courses; Educational Reform; Applied Research
References
[1] Wu Jing, Xiao Cong, Lu Yani. Research on Deep Integration of Online and Offline Teaching in the Era of Smart Education, Journal of Higher Education, 2025 (15): 1-6. [2] Garrison, D. Randy., Vaughan, et al. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008:5. [3] Christensen, Clayton. M., Horn, et al. Is K-12 Blended Learning Disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. Clayton Christensen Institute, 2013:26. [4] Rodgers, Carol. R., Raider‐Roth, et al. Presence in teaching. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 2006(12) (3):266. [5] Cleveland-Innes, M., Campbell Prisca. Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2012 (13) (4): 289. [6] Garrison and D. Randy. E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016. [7] Martha Cleveland-Innes and Dan Wilton. Guide to Blended Learning. Commonwealth of Learning, 2018:12. [8] Yuping Wang, Xibin, Han, et al. Revisiting the Blended Learning Literature: Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 2015 (18) (2), 380-393. [9] Rogers Carl. Counseling and Psychotherapy: Newer Concepts in Practice. Boston, Massachusetts & New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1942. [10] Zhao and Juming. The Reality and Name of Student-Centered Teaching Reform. Higher Education Review, 2022(6): 40-43. [11] Adarsh Kumar, Rajalakshmi Krishnamurthi, Surbhi Bhatia, et al. Blended Learning Tools and Practices: Comprehensive Analysis, IEEE Access, 2021(9): [12] Huang Ronghuai, Ma Ding, Zheng Lanqin,. et al. Course Design Theory Based on Blended Learning. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 2009(1): 9-14: 85151-85197. [13] Benayan Bani ALrasheedy, Abdalla Sayed Mohamed Gaballa, Kateb Alhamedi Alshammari, et al. The effect of blended learning on enhancing motivation for academic achievement in students in the faculties of humanity sciences at hail university. Acta Psychologica, 2025, 242: 104955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy. 2025.104955 [14] Smythe Michael. Toward a framework for evaluating blended learning. Future Challenges Sustainable Futures, 2012 (11):854. [15] Marko Radovan, Ema Meden, Danijela Makovec Radovan. Defining Elements of Blended Learning and Teachers’ Pedagogical and Digital Competencies: BlendVET–Blended learning in vocational education and training. 2022 (Unproofread text, for internal use only. Available: https://blendvet.si/
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved