AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 3 No. 1 (HEP 2026) >
An Anatomy of Reform: The Cognitive Role of the Organism Metaphor in China's Higher Education Policy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H261101
Author(s)
Jiang Weibin
Affiliation(s)
Minnan University of Science and Technology, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
Abstract
"Structural reform" represents a core policy direction for Chinese higher education during the 15th Five-Year Plan period. The frequent occurrence of terms such as "impeded blood flow" and "mechanism blockages" in official discourse constitutes a systematic "organism metaphor". Framed within conceptual metaphor theory from cognitive linguistics and employing critical discourse analysis, this paper examines relevant policy texts. The research finds that by conceptualising the higher education system as a living organism, the organism metaphor successfully reconstructs complex institutional issues into intuitive physiological problems of "health and disease". This cognitive framework not only endows "structural reform" with an unquestionable natural legitimacy and a sense of urgency for action, effectively simplifying public understanding and driving consensus formation for reform, but it also obscures deeper social complexities within the system, such as power struggles, cultural conflicts, and value choices. This paper reveals the powerful cognitive-constructive and driving effects of metaphor in policy discourse, provides a novel analytical perspective for understanding higher education reform in China, and offers critical reflection on the cognitive limitations that may arise from over-reliance on a single metaphorical framework.
Keywords
Organism Metaphor; Policy Reform; Cognitive Linguistics; Conceptual Metaphor Theory
References
[1]Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. [2]Flexner, A. (1930). Universities: American, English, German. Oxford University Press [3]Ashby, E. (1966). Universities: British, Indian, African: A study in the ecology of higher education. Harvard University Press. [4] Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39. [5] Bessant, J. (2002). Dawkins' Higher Education Reforms and How Metaphors Work in Policy Making. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. [6] Yu, Q.(2008). From the evolution of university metaphors to the evolution of higher education. Educational Research, (2).
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved