A Study on the Influencing Factors of Learning Outcomes in Software Engineering Courses
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H261103
Author(s)
Mingjin Shen, Xiaowen Li
Affiliation(s)
School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Henan Finance University, Zhengzhou, China
Abstract
The research explores the ambiguous determinants and insufficient adaptation of technology in the educational results of software engineering courses. Drawing from cognitive load theory and social constructivism, a tri-dimensional framework termed "technology penetration-collaboration efficacy-cognitive development" was developed to investigate the dynamics of technology empowerment, cooperative engagement, and individualized feedback. The study utilized a hybrid methodology, incorporating a semi-experimental setup (involving 92 students with intelligent system intervention versus94) involving conventional instruction) involving 186 junior students from a top-tier Double university, integrated with diverse data types (such as code logs, eye-tracking, EEG) and structural equation modeling. The findings showed a reverse U-shaped correlation between the depth of virtual simulations and educational results (indicated by the 14.3-hour inflection point, β=-0.18, p=0.02), with collaborative interaction playing a mediating role at 23.6% (β=0.19, 95%CI [0.05,0.33]), and notable influence of individualized feedback in groups with low motivation (ΔR2=0.15).There was a 24.7% enhancement in learning results observed in the test group (p<0.001).The research enhances the conceptual basis for aligning technology and cognition, with the created smart system boosting the superior project protection rate from 18% to 34%, offering concrete evidence for the evolution of digital education.
Keywords
Software Engineering Education; Learning Outcomes; Technology Empowerment; Collaborative Interaction; Multimodal Analysis
References
[1]Wan Qian. Research on the Utility Test and Influencing Factors of Online Collaborative Learning for College Students' Learning Outcomes. Supervisor: Zhang Shu. Sichuan Normal University, 2025.
[2]Zhou Feng, Wang Wei. Research on Key Factors Affecting the Learning Outcomes of Computer Basics Online Courses. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 2023, 19(24): 1-5.
[3]Xu Danyang. Research on Strategies for Improving the Learning Outcomes of Adult Online Learners Based on Persuasive Theory. Supervisor: Sun Li. Jiangnan University, 2024.
[4]Chen Lei. Teaching Analysis and Practice of Software Engineering Courses Based on Practical Tasks. Electronic Technology, 2024, 53(03): 250-251.
[5]Wang Yanqing, Zhang Lijie, Pan Wei, Zhou Xiuhu, Liu Xiaobing. Analysis of Unfavorable Behaviors Affecting Learning Outcomes in Computer Laboratory Teaching. Computer Education, 2008, (04): 10-13.
[6]Chen Yixuan. Research on the Online Learning Effect and Influencing Factors of Zhejiang University Students during the Epidemic. Supervisor: Guo Yuqing. Zhejiang University, 2021.
[7]Ping Li, Huimin Liang. Factors influencing learning effectiveness of educational travel: A case study in China. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2020, 42(C).
[8]Yu Song. Research on the Factors Influencing Learners' Intention to Continuously Use MOOC Courses. Supervisor: Jiang Hongren. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2021.
[9]Li Yingying, Zhang Hongmei, Zhang Haizhou. Construction and Empirical Test of the Satisfaction Model of College Students' Online Learning During the Epidemic: Based on a Survey of 15 Universities in Shanghai. Open Education Research, 2020, 26(04): 102-111.
[10]Qiao Yu, Yang Yuhuan. Research on the Reform and Practice of Software Engineering Course Evaluation Oriented to Technology Transfer. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 2024, 20(03): 148-150.
[11]Alessandra Giovagnoli, Daniele Romano. Optimal experiments in the presence of a learning effect: a problem suggested by software production. Statistical Methods & Applications, 2004, 13(2).