AEPH
Home > Higher Education and Practice > Vol. 3 No. 1 (HEP 2026) >
A Study on Teachers' Norm-Violating Behaviors from the Perspective of Game Theory
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H261122
Author(s)
Huang Yi, Liu Jin ,Wang Yijin
Affiliation(s)
Chongqing Academy of Educational Science, Chongqing, China
Abstract
This study constructs static and dynamic evolutionary game models between schools and teachers based on game theory to analyze their behavioral decision-making. The results reveal an incentive paradox between teachers and schools, where inappropriate incentives and penalties reduce the effectiveness of misconduct governance. After introducing positive social feedback parameters, the model shows that sufficient positive feedback will drive both parties to strictly fulfill their ethical and supervisory duties. Accordingly, this paper proposes targeted strategies: strengthening positive incentives, improving legal constraints, and optimizing supervision modes to build a long-term mechanism.
Keywords
Incentive Paradox; Evolutionary Game; Behavioral Choice; Mechanism for the Construction of Teacher Ethics
References
[1] Yang Y X, Ye C Y. Attribution and Governance of Primary and Secondary School Teachers' Professional Ethics Misconduct from the Perspective of Moral Education[J]. Modern Education Management, 2023(5):72-81. [2] Lu D K. Research on the Strategy and Path of College Teachers' Professional Ethics: From "Treating the Symptoms" to "Curing the Root Causes"[J]. Educational Science, 2015,31(2):64-70. [3] Zhang L Y. Multiple Games: An Analysis of Teachers' Moral Behavior Choices Under the Constraints of Cost and Benefit[J]. Education and Economy, 2014(2):60-63+72. [4] Zhang D S, Zhang Z G. Research on the Path of Hierarchical Governance of Teachers' Professional Ethics from the Perspective of Policy Tools[J]. Educational Science Research, 2015(8):26-29. [5] Zhao S Y. Research on the Path of College Teachers' Professional Ethics Construction from the Perspective of System Theory[J]. Journal of Yanbian University (Social Science Edition), 2012,45(2):102-105.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved