Innovation and Practice of an AI-Enabled Industry–Education Integration and Collaborative Education Mechanism for Digital Media Art Programs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/H261828
Author(s)
Qianyu Liu
Affiliation(s)
School of Arts and Media, Yunnan College of Business Management, Kunming, Yunnan, China
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), has transformed creative production processes and professional competency requirements in the digital media industry. These changes present new challenges for digital media art education, including outdated curricula, insufficient industry participation, limited integration of emerging technologies, and inadequate assessment mechanisms. This study explores the innovation of industry–education integration and collaborative education mechanisms in digital media art programs under AI-driven transformation. Based on experiential learning theory, project-based learning, and university–industry collaboration, a five-dimensional collaborative education framework is proposed, incorporating industry-oriented competency development, AI-integrated curriculum construction, dual-mentor teaching, authentic project-based learning, and multidimensional assessment. Furthermore, practical implementation strategies are developed to promote the integration of artistic creativity, intelligent technologies, and industry practices. The study provides a conceptual framework for improving interdisciplinary talent cultivation and advancing sustainable university–industry collaboration in digital media art education.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Digital Media Art; Industry-Education Integration; Collaborative Education; Generative AI; Talent Cultivation
References
[1] Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
[2] Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
[3] Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[4] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
[5] Perkmann, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
[6] Rezwana, J., & Maher, M. L. (2023). Designing creative AI partners with COFI: A framework for modeling interaction in human-AI co-creative systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(5), Article 67. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519026
[7] Tlili, A., et al. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
[8] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0