AEPH
Home > Industry Science and Engineering > Vol. 2 No. 3 (ISE 2025) >
New Quality Productivity Enabling Industrial Structural Upgrading in a Dual-Carbon Context
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/I255304
Author(s)
Dongchen Li
Affiliation(s)
School of International Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing,China
Abstract
This study utilizes Chinese provincial panel data from 2012 to 2023 to construct a comprehensive industrial structure coefficient. It empirically analyzes the impact of new quality productivity (NQP) on industrial structure advancement ("sophistication") and rationalization, with specific attention to carbon emission constraints. Key findings include the following points. Regarding core effects, NQP significantly promotes industrial structure upgrading, particularly advancement. However, this positive effect diminishes under high carbon emission levels, hindering structural optimization. The impact of NQP exhibits significant regional heterogeneity. A positive correlation emerges only in China's western region, while effects in eastern and central regions remain statistically insignificant. Policy interaction analysis through PSM-DID methodology reveals that the "14th Five-Year Plan for the Digital Economy" significantly boosts industrial upgrading in western China. Furthermore, NQP amplifies these policy benefits. Robustness tests indicate NQP correlates negatively with industrial structure rationalization but positively with advancement. This suggests its impact varies according to regional economic development stages. Collectively, these findings provide theoretical and empirical foundations for precisely formulating regional industrial policies under China's dual-carbon goals.
Keywords
Carbonneutral; Digital Technology Level; Industrial Structure Upgrading; New Quality Productivity
References
[1] Hongduo Liu, Jinyan Wu, Xuan Wu, et al. Local-led industrial policy innovation enables the emergence of new quality productivity: a research perspective based on the "chain leader system" of the industrial chain. Xinjiang Social Science, 2024, (03): 53- 67. DOI: 10.20003/j.cnki.xjshkx.2024.03.006. [2] Wanli Zhao, Linchun Quan. The Value Implications, Internal Logic and Practical Direction of Enabling High-Quality Development by New-Quality Productivity. Modern Communication, 2024, (12):57-65+123. [3] Xiaodong Chen. Accelerating the construction of modernized industrial system with new quality productivity. Struggle,2024, (22): 12-13. DOI:10.16634/j.cnki.cn23-1001/d.2024.22.002. [4] Yuxin Ren, Yan Wu, Zhe Wu. Financial agglomeration, industry-university-research cooperation and new quality productivity. Financial Theory and Practice,2024,45(03):27-34. DOI: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbcjb.2024.03.004. [5] Wenhui Zhou, Yijun Wang, Lijia Chen. Research on the driving mode of regional new quality productivity empowered by digital economy under the group perspective. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics,2025,41(01):69-79. DOI: 10.16537/j.cnki.jynufe.001000. [6] Xueping Wu, Zhongying Zhang. Research on the impact of digital economy development on industrial structure upgrading in Anhui Province. Finance Theory and Teaching,2024,42(06): 77-86. DOI: 10.13298/j.cnki.ftat.2024.06.012. [7] Yuanyin Pang. The realization path of digital economy empowering new quality productivity development in the new era. Times Economy and Trade,2024,21(12): 21-23. DOI: 10.19463/j.cnki.sdjm.2024.12.001. [8] Wenshi Luo, Jinghao Lu. Research on the Impact of Digital Economy on Regional Industrial Structure Upgrading - Based on Empirical Evidence from 288 Prefecture-level Cities in China. China Business Journal,2024,33(23): 29-32. DOI: 10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2024.23.029. [9] Japeng Chen, Dandan Liu, Aiting Xu. Does Industrial Structure Upgrading Reduce Carbon Emission Intensity? --An Examination Based on Green Tax Perspective. China Environmental Management,2024,16(04): 80-90. DOI: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2024.04.080. [10] Chenlu Zhang, Fan Zhang. Impact of new quality productivity and industrial structure upgrading on carbon emissions--an empirical study based on panel data of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Changjiang University (Social Science Edition),2024,47(04):59-67. [11] Manfeng Liu, Sijia Cheng. Has carbon emissions trading promoted the optimization and upgrading of regional industrial structure? Management Review,2022,34(07):33-46. 11-5057/f.2022.07.015. [12] Jing Zhang, Jun Shen, Meng Xu. Does Carbon Emission Trading Promote Industrial Structure Transformation and Upgrading? --Empirical Evidence from China's Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy. Economic Issues,2023(08):84-91. 2023.08.010. [13] Jingbing Sun, Zhenyang Gu. Will Carbon Emission Trading Mechanism Force Industrial Structure Transformation and Upgrading? --Based on the perspective of synergistic agglomeration of manufacturing and productive service industries. Ecological Economy,2023,39(05):59-68. [14] RongshengCai , Chuanyang Liu. CarbonLow, Technological Progress and Industrial Structure Upgrading: An Empirical Analysis Based on VEC Model and Impulse Response Function. Financial Research,2012(06):33-36. 2012.06.009. [15] Ziyuan Lv. The impact of digital economy on industrial structure upgrading--with carbon emission as the mediating variable . Research on Business Economics,2023(14):98-102. [16] Y Wang, L Li. Digital economy, industrial structure upgrading, and residents' consumption: Empirical evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 92: 1045-1058. Sui B, Sharma S S, Yao L Y, et al. Does aging affect renewable energy? the role of extreme events and economic development. Energy Economics, 2024, 133: 107491. [17] X Xing, A Ye. Consumption Upgrading and Industrial Structural Change: A General Equilibrium Analysis and Empirical Test with Low-Carbon Green Transition Constraints. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14(20): 13645. DOI:10.3390/su142013645. [18] K Tang, Y Wang, H Wang. The impact of innovation capability on green development in China's urban agglomerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 200: 123128. [19] H J Wang, M Q Zheng, H T Yin, et al. Green innovation, industrial structure and urban eco-efficiency in Chinese cities. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2024, 82: 1011-1024. [20] M Tao, Poletti S, Wen L, et al. Modelling the role of industrial structure adjustment on China's energy efficiency: Insights from technology innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 441: 140861. [21] X Liu, C Qin, B Liu, et al. The economic and environmental dividends of the digital development strategy: evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 440: 140398. [22] M Zhong, Umar M, Mirza N, et al. Mineral resource Optimization: the Nexus of sustainability, digital transformation, and green finance in OECD economies. Resources Policy, 2024, 90: 104829. [23] Y Feng, Y Gao, X Xia, et al. Identifying the path choice of digital economy to crack the “resource curse” in China from the perspective of configuration. RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 91: 104912. DOI: 10.1016/j. resourpol.2024.104912. [24] Huaping Sun; Tingting Chen, Christoph Nedopil Wang. Spatial impact of digital finance on carbon productivity. Geoscience Frontiers, 2024, 15(3): 101674. [25] Vaithilingam S, Ong C S, Moisescu O I, et al. Robustness checks in PLS-SEM: A review of recent practices and recommendations for future applications in business research. Journal of Business Research, 2024, 173: 114465. [26] Hang Yuan, Chengliang Zhu. Have national high-tech zones promoted the transformation and upgrading of China's industrial structure. China Industrial Economy,2018, (08):60-77. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2018.08.004.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved