Search

Research on the Construction of a Friendly Educational Evaluation Mechanism for Rural Preschool Teachers

Author(s)

Jie Du*, Jinjin Niu

Affiliation(s)

School of Education Science, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China *Corresponding Author

Abstract

The construction of a "friendly" educational evaluation mechanism for rural preschool teachers essentially involves shifting the focus of preschool education evaluation from "management and judgment" of the labor group to "development and empowerment" of individual teachers. And from this crucial entry point, fully understand and respect the uniqueness and challenges of the work of rural preschool teachers. Through the construction of this "friendly" evaluation mechanism, to stimulate the internal motivation of teachers, promote their professional growth, and ultimately benefit every rural child. This research will focus on this core and conduct a systematic discussion from aspects such as the concept, challenges, reform directions and implementation paths.

Keywords

"Friendly" Evaluation Mechanism; Educational Evaluation; Rural Preschool Teachers

References

[1] Li H., Chen K., Yan L., et al. Citizenization of rural migrants in China's new urbanization: The roles of hukou system reform and rural land marketization. Cities, 2023, 132, 103968. [2] Basham J. D., Blackorby J., & Marino M. T. Opportunity in crisis: The role of universal design for learning in educational redesign. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2020, 18(1), 71-91. [3] Wang Y., Gao J., Duan Q., et al. Impacts of rural revitalization on early childhood education in China: a triangulated stakeholder study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2025, 1-16. [4] Pont, B. A literature review of school leadership policy reforms. European Journal of Education, 2020, 55(2), 154-168. [5] Suri D., & Chandra D. Teacher's strategy for implementing multiculturalism education based on local cultural values and character building for early childhood education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 2021, 8(4), 271-285. [6] Matjokana T. N. M. Early childhood care and education policy intentions and the realities in rural areas. Perspectives in Education, 2023, 41(2), 258-274. [7] Goldman P. S., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Bradford B., et al. Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 2: policy and practice recommendations for global, national, and local actors. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2020, 4(8), 606-633. [8] Mhlongo S., Mbatha K., Ramatsetse B., et al. Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 2023, 9(6). [9] Ozawa S., Laing S. K., Higgins C. R., et al. Educational and economic returns to cognitive ability in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. World development, 2022, 149, 105668. [10]Prahani B., Rizki I., Jatmiko B., et al. Artificial intelligence in education research during the last ten years: A review and bibliometric study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2022, 17(8), 169-188.