Practice Teaching Innovation of Computer Science Majors in the Context of Engineering Education Accreditation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O252307
Author(s)
Liang Zong, Yun Chen, Yuanjun Liu, Weibin Liu*
Affiliation(s)
College of Information Science and Engineering, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, Hunan, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
With the continuous promotion of engineering education accreditation, computer science majors have put forward higher requirements for students' comprehensive quality, especially practical ability and innovative spirit. This paper combines the current teaching practice in colleges and universities, analyzes the problems in practice teaching in depth, and puts forward systematic reform suggestions from the aspects of course content, teaching form, platform construction and industry-teaching collaboration. Through the comprehensive analysis of typical college cases and policy orientation, it explores the sustainable and effective teaching innovation path to provide reference and reference for computer science majors to cultivate high-quality engineering talents.
Keywords
Engineering Education Accreditation; Computer Science Major; Practical Teaching; Industry-Teaching Integration
References
[1] Hol A, Richardson J, Hamilton M, et al. Strengthening Undergraduate Information Systems Education in an Increasingly Complex Computing Disciplines Landscape[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2024, 54(1): 50-65.
[2] Blumenthal R. Alignment among normative, prescriptive, and descriptive models of computer science curriculum: The effect of ABET accreditation on CS education[J]. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 2022, 22(3): 1-27.
[3] Servin C, Hawthorne E K, Postner L, et al. Curricular and Pedagogical Considerations in Computer Science Education: The Role of Community Colleges for the Next Decade[C]//Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 2024: 1196-1201.
[4] Al-Obaidi A S M. CDIO initiative: A guarantee for successful accreditation of engineering programmes[J]. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 2021, 6(1): 81-92.
[5] Zhang F, Zhang X. Achievement Degree Evaluation Method of Operating System Course Targets under the Background of Engineering Education Accreditation[C]//2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI). IEEE, 2021: 5-9.
[6] Saeed S, Almuhaideb A M, Bamarouf Y A, et al. Sustainable Program Assessment Practices: A review of the ABET and NCAAA computer information systems accreditation process[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(23): 12691.
[7] Apiola M, Saqr M, López-Pernas S, et al. Computing education research compiled: Keyword trends, building blocks, creators, and dissemination[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 27041-27068.
[8] Gupta C, Gupta V. C4 skills in the engineering graduate: A study to align software engineering education with market-driven software industry needs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2023, 67(1): 31-43.
[9] Ali Q I. Surveying Different Student Outcome Assessment Methods for ABET Accredited Computer Engineering Programs[J]. Research Reports on Computer Science, 2023: 56-76.
[10] Yuan X, Wan J, An D, et al. Multi-method integrated experimental teaching reform of a programming course based on the OBE-CDIO model under the background of engineering education[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 16623.