Item Preparation and Design of Teaching Psychological Quality Assessment Scale for Vocational School Teachers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O252602
Author(s)
Jiangyi Lv1, Cherry Jiang2, Zhiwang Gan3
Affiliation(s)
1Beijing Polytechnic University, Beijing, China
2Columbia University, New York, US
3Tianjin Peisheng Education Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China
Abstract
Given the unique nature and critical importance of vocational college faculty, it is essential to conduct scientific research on their teaching psychological qualities and develop an assessment scale with systematic application methods for educational evaluation. This study employed vocational college teachers as subjects, and through preliminary research interviews and predictive analysis, developed a teaching psychological quality assessment scale for vocational educators. The teacher teaching psychological quality assessment scale, developed using the University Teacher Teaching Psychological Quality Assessment (DTPA) and Middle School Teacher Professional Identity (MTCA) as criterion-referenced questionnaires, serves as a measurement tool for vocational college faculty's teaching psychological qualities. The scale comprises six factors: expressive communication, innovation, hands-on demonstration, stability, wisdom, and professional identity.
Keywords
Psychological Quality Assessment Scale; Vocational Technology; Factor Analysis
References
[1]Li Min, Qiu Bingchang. Application and Reflection of Electronic Portfolio Evaluation in Vocational Film and Animation Education under the Background of New Era Educational Assessment Reform. China Vocational and Technical Education, 2023(05): 92-96.
[2]Hu Lei, Hu Peicheng, Tang Maoqin, Yang Xiaodong, Wang Airong, Liu Ying, Cao Bingyu, Liu Lanfen, Bai Ludong, Zhu Weiguo. Reliability and Validity of the Female Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire in Schizophrenic Patients. Journal of Psychiatry, 2010, 23(04): 241-243.
[3]Jia Ru, Wang Dafang, Wu Rengang. Preliminary development of a mental health assessment scale for cosmetic surgery patients. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2010, 18(04):405-408. DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2010.04.003.
[4]Liu Jiao, Shi Xiaomao, Ma Lingzhi. Medical staff's cognition and demand for Internet hospital. Journal of Medical Informatics, 2021, 42(08): 30-33.
[5]Shan Junhao, Li Xiaoying, Yan Hanbing. Agile Student Evaluation: Connotation, Characteristic Positioning and Design Strategies. Educational Technology Research, 2022, 43(02): 102-108+128.
[6]Zhao Yang. Principles, Content System and Implementation Path of Labor Education Evaluation in Higher Vocational Colleges. Education and Vocational, 2023(05): 13-20. DOI:10.13615/j.cnki.1004-3985.2023.05.006.
[7]Li Zuozhang and Ni Xiaofeng. Social Organization's Participation in Vocational Education Evaluation: Legitimacy, Limits and Feasible Approaches. Vocational and Technical Education, 2023, 44(01): 53-59.
[8]Zhou Mingxing and Tang Shuyu. Quality Evaluation of Higher Vocational Education in the Context of Type Contexts: Historical Reflections, Current Challenges, and Future Paths. Vocational Education Forum, 2022, 38(10): 105-111.
[9]Huang Guanli, Liu Ling, Yang Ping et al. Development and reliability/validity of the psychological quality scale for vocational college teachers. Journal of Psychiatry, 2014, 27(06): 401-404.
[10]Feng Xiumei, Jiang Yuchen, Wang Yiting. Intelligent Evaluation of Classroom Teaching Language: Effectiveness, and Optimization. Journal of Teacher Education, 2025, 12(04): 51-61. DOI: 1.13718/j.cnki.jsjy.2025.04.006.