The Current Status and Countermeasures of Professional Identity among Special Education Publicly Funded Normal Students
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/O252904
Author(s)
Zuqin Lu1,2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Guangdong Key Laboratory of Special Children's Development and Education, Zhanjiang, China
2School of Educational Sciences, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, China
*Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to explore the current status and influencing factors of professional identity among publicly funded special education normal students. Utilizing a university student professional identity questionnaire, a survey was conducted among 205 publicly funded special education normal students. The findings reveal that: 1) the overall professional identity of these students ranks moderately above average, with scores descending in the order of affective identity, cognitive identity, behavioral identity, and suitability identity; 2) significant differences exist among grade levels, with freshmen and sophomores scoring notably higher than juniors and seniors; 3) the major selection basis significantly impacts professional identity, whereby students who self-selected their major exhibited markedly higher scores than those who chose based on parental preference or assignment. The results provide empirical evidence and pragmatic pathways for optimizing training programs and enhancing professional identity among publicly funded special education normal university students.
Keywords
Special Education; Publicly Funded Normal Students; Professional Identity; Altruistic Motivation; Major Selection Basis
References
[1] Liu Bozhi. Comprehensively Improving the Popularization Level of Special Education — Q&A with the Head of the Basic Education Department of the Ministry of Education on the Second Phase of the Special Education Enhancement Plan. China Education Daily, 2017-07-11 (03).
[2] Xu Zhiyu, Wang Yan. On the Opinions of “Comprehensively Deepening the Reform of Teaching Staff Construction in the New Era”——Speeding Up the Construction of High-quality Specialized Special Education Teachers. Teacher Education Research, 2019, 31(1): 24-30.
[3] Lei Li. A Study on the Impact of Professional Identity of Special Education Graduates on Employment Choice. Modern Special Education (Higher Education Research), 2019 (8): 50-67.
[4] Fitzgerald A. Professional identity: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 2020,55(4):579-586.
[5] Wang Dingming, Liu Yongcun. An investigation of the professional program approbation of graduate education (Master). China Higher Education Research, 2007 (8): 18-22.
[6] Xu Jiaxin. Survey on the Current Situation of Professional Identity of Special Education Normal University Students — A Case Study of Three Normal Universities in Jiangxi Province. Teacher Development, 2020 (6): 27-31.
[7] Qin Panbo. Characteristics and Related Studies of College Students’ Professional Identity. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2009.
[8] Guan Chunlan, Wang Yan, Zhang Limin. An Investigation into the Present Professional Identity of Undergraduates Majoring in Special Education-A Case Study of Two Key Normal Universities Directly Under the Ministry of Education. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 2011 (4): 22-29.
[9] Hu Yuting, Lei Jingguo. An Investigation into Present Situation of Professional Identity of Undergraduates Majoring in Special Education at Local Universities-A Case Study of Guizhou Education University. Journal of Changchun University, 2016, 26(11): 120-124.
[10] Hu Jinping, Wang Xiaoyan. A Study on the Professional Identity of Students majoring in Special Education in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of Jinan University. Journal of Suihua University, 2018, 38 (4): 145-149.
[11] Zhu Shu, Xin Hong. The Relationship between Professional Identity, Time Management, and Personality of Medical Graduate Students. Chongqing Medical Journal, 2012 (23): 2445-2448.
[12] Zhao Bin. Strengthening practical teaching to enhance the professional competence of special education teacher candidates. Modern Special Education (Higher Education Research), 2021 (16): 18-20.
[13] Zhang Huiping, Li Hong. A Study on the Altruistic Motivation of College Students. Psychological and Behavioral Research, 2006,4 (4): 285-289.
[14] Chen Yirong, Wu Zhongliang. The impact of perceived class atmosphere on learning engagement among special education teacher trainees: the mediating role of professional identity and the moderating role of future orientation. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38 (2): 244-253.
[15] Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Brown, A. A. (2017). Social motivation: Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 299–325.