Search

Development of Clean Energy Discourse Studies: A Systematic Review of Chinese and International Linguistic Research

Author(s)

Miaohong Fan

Affiliation(s)

Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin, China

Abstract

Clean energy has become a sustained focus in public discourse both domestically and internationally. Its development bears significance not only for environmental protection and economic growth, but also as a crucial national strategy for enhancing international influence and ensuring energy security. Based on searches of CNKI and WOS databases, this paper systematically reviews the development of clean energy discourse studies grounded in linguistic theories, aiming to provide references for researchers. The research indicates that domestic clean energy discourse studies emerged in the 1970s, while international research began in the 1980s. As the field entered its development phase, both the research content and analytical perspectives have become increasingly diversified.

Keywords

Clean Energy, Energy Transition, Energy Discourse, Discourse Analysis

References

[1] Zhao Xiufeng. The System and Scope of Energy Discourse Research. Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University, 2018, 25 (03). [2] Zheng Keyan. Geothermal Energy: A Clean and Economical Energy Source. Environmental Protection, 1978 (05). [3] Nelkin,D., Pollak,M. Ideology as strategy: The discourse of the anti-nuclear movement in France and Germany. Science, Technology,&Human Values, 1980,5(30):3-13. [4] Krzywda,J., Krzywda, D. & Androniceanu, A. Managing the energy transition through discourse: The case of Poland. Energies, 2021, 14 (20):1-23. [5] Kong Deliang, Han Hui. A Study of the New Energy Discourse Characteristics and Mirror Reflections from the Times———Corpus Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 2023, 39 (02). [6] Qian Yufang,Wang Conghan. Discursive Constructions around the Dual-Carbon Goals in the People’s Daily: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 2023, (04):69-77. [7] Zhang Qinghua, Zhang Huijuan. A Comparative Analysis of Self-Constructed and Other-Constructed Discourses in the Corporate Image. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 2025, 41 (05). [8] Zheng Wei, Dong Baohua. Translation Strategies of Energy Metaphors from the Perspective of the “Embodiment-Culture-Cognition” Three-dimensional Framework: A Case Study of China’s Energy Transition White Paper. Journal of Shandong University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2025, 41(06) [9] Zhang Yuanyue, Chen Jining. A Comparative Study on Metaphorical Framing in China-UK Energy Discourse———A Corpus Analysis of the Energy White Papers for the 21st Century. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences), 2023, 39 (01) [10] Zhao Xiufeng and Wu Yuxi. A Critical Analysis of Deliberate Metaphors in Political Cartoons on Energy Crisis: A Case Study of Health and Illness Multimodal Metaphor Scenarios. Foreign Languages Research, 2024, 41 (02). [11] Hu Qing. A Positive Discourse Analysis of “Dual Carbon” News Reports from the Appraisal Theory. Journal of News Research, 2023, 14 (11). [12] Ma Jingjing, Zhan Quanwang. Discourse Strategies in the Construction of National Image from the Perspectives of Attitude Resources: A Case Study of of the English version of Energy in China’s New Era. Journal of Henan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2021, 37 (05). [13] Zhou Xiaochun. A Corpus-based Positive Discourse Analysis of China’s Image Constructed by the Domestic Mainstream Media in the Context of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2023, 24(04). [14] Poole, R. A corpus-aided ecological discourse analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine debate of Arizona, USA. Discourse&Communication, 2016, 10 (6): 576-595. [15] He Wei, Cheng Ming. A Study of the Ecological Values in the Tweets about the US Clean Energy Based on Text Mining Technology. Foreign Languages in China, 2024, 21 (06). [16] Zhao Xiufeng, Liu Chang. A Comparative Study of Energy White Papers between China and Britain from the Perspective of International Ecological Discourse. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 36 (06). [17] Ren Ran, GAO Ge. Constructing a Chinese Route and Ecosophy for Double Carbon Discourse through the News Reports from China Daily and Xinhua. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), 2024,40(04).