AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 2 No. 4 (PSS 2025) >
A Study on the Dissemination of Discourses of "Five Education" Practices in Colleges and Universities under Lasswell's 5W Communication Model
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P253401
Author(s)
Zhijing Zhong
Affiliation(s)
Guangdong Teachers College of Foreign Language and Arts, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Abstract
The practice of "five-education" in colleges and universities is flourishing, and its discourse dissemination has become a key pain point that needs to be solved in the new era. Starting from Lasswell's 5W communication model, this paper explores the five discourse elements and the logic of evolution, such as the main mode of discourse dissemination, content orientation, channel mode, object status, effect strength, etc., and puts forward the practical way of discourse construction, by transforming the "right paradigm", turning to "diversified life", and then to "multiple life". By transforming the "right paradigm", shifting to "diversified life", transforming "intelligent drive", rotating "internal cultivation and external broadcasting", and transforming "perspective and method", it further strengthens its discourse construction method", further enhance the "leading value" power of discourse subject, "resonance youth" vigour of discourse content, "wisdom gatekeeping" power of discourse channel, "tension" power of discourse object, and "wisdom gatekeeping" power of discourse subject. Tension, discourse object "three-dimensional infiltration" gravitational force, discourse effect "to establish a career" strength, so as to promote the "five education" and the practice of high-quality development, in order to achieve the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation to play a better role. The Chinese Government has been playing a better role in the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
Keywords
Lasswell; Colleges and Universities; "Five Education"; Discourse Communication
References
[1] Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.). The Communication of Ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Harper & Brothers. [2] Liu Linlin. Research on the mechanism of constructing the discourse right of "five education". Zhongzhou Journal. 2018 (02): 27. [3] Wang Zhihe. Foucault. Hunan Education Press, 1999:37. [4] German Habermas. Interaction and Social Evolution. Zhang Boshu, Translation. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing House, 1989:3. [5] Yang Xin. Constituent elements of the "five education" discourse of its realisation. Journal of Hubei Administrative College.2013:50. [6] Foucault Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. volume I,New York: Vintage,1990:92—116. [7] Foucault Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. volume I, New York: Vintage, 1990:92—116. [8] Huang Xinquan. The Constructive Characteristics and Evolutionary Logic of the Discourse of "Five Education" on the Internet. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition). 2022(05): 154. [9] Zhang Shouqiang, Li Lanfen. Situation of Marxist moral discourse and its construction. Xuehai, 2010(6): 10-12. [10] Yuen Tong Wai, Cheung Chi Chuen. The Value Implications, Problems and Optimisation Strategies of "Five Education" and Practical Discourse in Cyberspace. Ideological Education Research.2021. (03):93. [11] Liu, Yibo. Under the shadow of artificial intelligence: Ethical dilemmas in government big data governance. Administrative Forum.2018. (03):45. [12] Zhang Chunhua. Internet public opinion: A sociological interpretation. Beijing: Social Science Literature Press, 2012:221-227. [13] Xu Xiaolin, Zhu Guowei. Interpretation and orientation: An institutionalist vision of movement-based governance. Learning and Practice, 2011(8):25. [14] Wang Dahai, Zhang Yulei. From campaign governance to institutionalised governance: The choice of governance mode for new urbanisation. Exploration and Controversy, 2013(11).
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved