Discussion on the Causes and Characteristics of the "Buddy Socializing" Phenomenon among Contemporary Youth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P253409
Author(s)
Ning Yang1, Xianhong Wu2,*
Affiliation(s)
1Department of Sociology, School of Political Science and Law, University of Jinan, China
2Department of Administrative Management, School of Political Science and Law, University of Jinan, China
*Corresponding Author.
Abstract
The "Buddy-style" socializing, as an emerging social paradigm, is characterized by flattened relationships and refined companionship with vertical domain segmentation. It facilitates the breakthrough of interpersonal communication from complex relational networks, gaining widespread favor and general acknowledgment among the youth. The formation of this social model can be primarily attributed to the the "Need for Boundaries" in Interpersonal Relationships,self-release in a fast-paced society,the transformation of communication concepts in the digital age . Its distinct features are manifested in the following aspects:precision companionship-style, Appropriate boundary awareness, weak ties Replacing Strong Ties.
Keywords
Buddy Socializing; Social Characteristics; Weak Ties; Strong Ties
References
[1]YuHe, Zhou Huan. Psychological Perspective and Realistic Reflection on the "Buddy-style" Superficial Social Interaction among Youth—Based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action [J]. Theoretic Horizon, 2023(10): 96-103.
[2]Liang Dan. Precise Companionship in Vertical Fields: The Narrative Picture and Guidance Path of Youth's New Social Pattern [J]. China Youth Study, 2024(1).
[3]Wang Xindi, Hu Penghui. Boundary Awareness: The Social Needs and Construction of Youth in Modern Society [J]. China Youth Study, 2022(10).
[4]GRANOVETTER M S. The Strength of Weak Ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
[5]Zhang Fangxu, Wen Jun. From "Disembedding" to "Embedding": An Analysis of the Urbanization Process of Agricultural Transfer Populations from the Perspective of Individualization [J]. Journal of Humanities, 2016(7): 122-128.
