Search

Child-Friendly Community Public Service System Broussonetia Papyrifera Construction Logic - A Theoretical Study from the Perspective of Inclusive Development

Author(s)

Yin Guoli

Affiliation(s)

School of Political Science and Law, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong, China

Abstract

This paper explores the construction logic and value orientation of child-friendly community public service systems from the perspective of inclusive development theory. The study identifies current issues in community public services, including uneven spatial resource allocation, homogeneous service provision, and insufficient child participation. Through theoretical analysis and case studies, the construction logic is proposed as follows: prioritizing children's needs by thoroughly analyzing their diverse requirements in physiological, psychological, social, and educational dimensions; integrating resources from multiple stakeholders, including governments, community organizations, enterprises, and families, to foster collaborative efforts; and delivering diversified service content and methods encompassing educational support, health promotion, social empowerment, and cultural participation. In terms of value orientation, the paper emphasizes fairness, justice, and sustainability, advocating for transcending formal equality to achieve differentiated capability empowerment while addressing intergenerational equity and ecological resilience. Additionally, countermeasures are suggested to tackle challenges such as imbalanced resource allocation, policy implementation deviations, limited child participation, and cultural biases, aiming to advance child-friendly community development and ensure the protection of children's rights alongside harmonious community growth.

Keywords

Child-Friendly Community; Inclusive Development Theory; Public Service System

References

[1]State Council. Program for the Development of Chinese Children：2021 - 2030.2021.09.30 [2]Xiang Deping. The Implications of Inclusive Development Concepts for China's Social Policy Construction of Broussonetia Papyrifera [J]. social science, 2012 (1):70-74. [3]Zhu Weijian. Creating the Chenghua Model of "Child-Friendly Communities" [J]. China's civil affairs, 2021 (2):34-35.1 [4]Li Jing, Ling Lu. Child-Friendly: Multidimensional Implications and Contemporary Value [J]. Contemporary Youth Studies, 2023 (2):100-111. [5]Wu Jinqun, Mao Jianan. The Theoretical Connotation and Policy Agenda of Child-Friendly City Construction [J]. Party and government research, 2022 (4):100-112. [6]Wu Zhaofan, Lei Huixia. Analysis of the Connotation and Strategic Framework of Child-Friendly Streets: Based on the Concept of Child-Friendly Cities in China [J]. Urban Planning, 2022,46 (11):32-41. [7]Yuan Rui, Zhu Nelumbo nucifera, Jiao Simeng. Safeguarding Children's Rights in the Construction of Child-Friendly Communities: A Case Study Based on Community Z [J]. Research on Children and Adolescents, 2023 (6):53-61. [8]Koelreuteria paniculata Xi, Luo Xin. The Developmental Value of Urban Public Spaces for Children from a Child-Friendly Perspective and Their Realization Pathways under Utheisa Kong [J]. Shanghai Educational Research, 2024 (4):8-15. [9]Zhang Huiping. Building Child-Friendly Cities: Experiences from Developing Countries and Their Implications [J]. Social Construction, 2021,8 (2):64-74. [10]Feng Ying. A Preliminary Study on the Construction of Child-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Empowerment—Taking "Children's Voices, Children's Participation" as an Example [J]. International Public Relations, 2024 (10):35-37. [11]Zhou Wang, Yang Shanshan, Chen Wentian. Towards Child-Friendly Communities: Analytical Framework, Typical Cases, and Policy Implementation Pathways [ [J]. Homo sapiens rights, 2021 (3):148-165. [12]United Nations Children's Fund. Building Child - Friendly Cities and Communities: A Handbook[M]. 2019. [13]Chawla L. Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss [J]. People and Nature, 2020,2 (3):619 - 642. [14]James A, Prout A. Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood[M]. Routledge,2015. [15]Kernan M. Outdoor learning environments: Spaces for exploration, discovery and risk - taking [J]. Children's Geographies, 2020,18 (6):643 - 657. [16]Ng C, et al. Healthy city design for children: Evidence from Singapore's community health grids [J]. Journal of Urban Health, 2021,98 (4):532 - 545. [17]Woolcock M. Social capital and community resilience: Lessons from Canadian intergenerational programs [J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2020,257:113084. [18]Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development[M]. Harvard University Press,1979. [19]European Union. Child - Friendly Urban Standards[M]. Brussels: EU Publications,2023. [20]Prunus salicina Mingzhe. Analysis of the Social Effects of Intergenerational Shared Public Service Facilities [J]. Sociological Studies, 2021 (3). [21]Wang Sibin. Research on the Delivery System of Child Welfare Services in China [J]. Sociological Studies, 2017 (3):45 - 60. [22]Liu Neng. Construction of Child-Friendly Communities in Cities from the Perspective of Intergenerational Justice [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020,27 (5):12 - 18. [23]Prunus salicina Yingsheng. Barriers to Social Integration of Children with Special Needs and Policy Responses [J]. Social Security Research, 2019 (2):78 - 85. [24]James A, Prout A. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood[M]. Routledge,2015.