AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 2 No. 6 (PSS 2025) >
The Technological Evolution of Accessible Information Transmission between Braille and Staff Notation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P253615
Author(s)
Lihua Chai1,*, Yue Fu1, Jiang Pan2
Affiliation(s)
1Department of Special Education, Zhejiang Vocational College of Special Education, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China 2China Braille Publishing House, Beijing, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
This article traces and analyzes the historical evolution and information communication issues of Braille music notation, analyzing the development of Braille music notation both domestically and internationally, focusing on the technological evolution from the challenges of traditional Braille music to its digital conversion. By comparing and analyzing the forms of Braille music notation from different periods, this article reveals the technological evolutionary path of the accessible transmission of musical information. The study traces the formation of Chinese Braille Music Notation Standards (e.g., GB/T 16431-2008), analyzes the development of the international Braille music notation, and explores the potential for the evolution of the typesetting concept of "gradual one-to-one correspondence with stave notation." This article not only presents a historical overview of Braille music notation typesetting technology but also offers a forward-looking outlook on future technological development trends, providing historical and technical references for promoting information accessibility in music education for the visually impaired.
Keywords
Braille Music Notation; Staff Notation; Information Transmission; Accessibility; Translation and Typesetting
References
[1]Jacko V A, Choi J H, Carballo A, Charlson B, Moore J E. A new synthesis of sound and tactile music code instruction in a pilot online Braille Music curriculum. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 2015, 109:153–7. [2]Park H Y, Kim M J. Affordance of Braille music as a mediational means: significance and limitations. British Journal of Music Education. 2014, 31:137–55. [3]Englebretson R, Holbrook M C, Fischer-Baum S. A position paper on researching braille in the cognitive sciences: decentering the sighted norm. Applied Psycholinguistics 2023, 44: 400–15. [4]Mueller A. When Disability and Music Met Maker Culture: The Long(er) History of Accessible Music Notation. Eighteenth Century Music. 2025, 22:5–13. [5]BRAILLE AUTHORITY OF NORTH AMERICA. Music Braille Code 2015. The Braille Authority of North America, 2016. [6]Braille2000, LLC. Braille2000 Music Transcription Overview. Braille2000, LLC, 2021. [7]Gotoh T, Minamikawa-Tachino R, Tamura N. A web-based braille translation for digital music scores. ACM. 2008, 259–60. [8]UKAAF, RNIB. Introduction to Automated braille music transcription: Guidance from UKAAF. 1.0. UK Association for Accessible Formats (UKAAF), 2024. [9]Coates R L. Accommodating Band Students with Visual Impairments. Music Educators Journal. 2012, 99: 60–6. [10]Lu L, Crispin C, Girouard A. “We musicians know how to divide and conquer”: Exploring multimodal interactions to improve music reading and memorization for blind and low vision learners. ASSETS’24: Proceedings of the 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2024, 1–14.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved