AEPH
Home > Philosophy and Social Science > Vol. 3 No. 4 (PSS 2026) >
Fertility Intention of Urban Youth: the Impact of Family Stress and Social Welfare Perception on Their Plans for Having Children
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62381/P263412
Author(s)
Wang Chenchen*
Affiliation(s)
School of Politics and Law, University of Jinan, Jinan, Shandong, China *Corresponding Author
Abstract
With the background of continuous low birth rates around the world, the population structure and social development are facing severe problems. This trend is visible in developed countries that have finished the demographic transition, as well as in many developing countries in China. In China, the consistently low intention to have children among young urban people has become a serious problem of demographic change. Based on the literature review method, this paper takes the two main variables of family role stress and social welfare perception to explore how they affect the fertility intentions of young people in cities. Based on the above research results, it is found that the several types of family role stress are gender role conflict, intergenerational conflict and work-family conflict, while social welfare perception refers to how young people evaluate the accessibility, sufficiency and credibility of policy support. The two forces work together to provide both the push and pull factors for people's decisions; at the same time, they are closely related and change over time during the process of fertility intention formation and realisation. Based on the analysis above, this paper proposes a general framework for the stress-perception-plan model, points out shortcomings in the current research, such as a lack of progress in mechanism studies, the absence of dynamic process capture and cultural integration, etc., and put forward suggestions for future research and related policies.
Keywords
Fertility Intention; Urban Youth; Family Role Stress; Social Welfare Perception
References
[1] Dong, X., & Tong, Y. J. (2025). Research on the influence of social capital on elderly sports consumption. Zhejiang Sport Science, 47(4), 32-37, 86. [2] Zheng, Z. Z. (2025). Fertility-friendly policy options for youth and families. Youth Exploration, (5), 5-15. [3] Zhao, F., Chen, L. W., & Gui, Y. (2023). A ten-year change in fertility intention among youth (2012-2021): An age-period-cohort analysis. Northwest Population Journal, (2), 54-66. [4] Xu, S. C., & Feng, R. (2025). The influence of parent-child relationship on children's fertility intention. Population Research, (2), 30-41. [5] Wang, R. Q., & Ge, J. J. (2026). The inhibitory effect and mechanism of migration on youth fertility intention: An analysis based on 2021 CGSS data. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (2), 23-32. [6] Dong, L., Liu, X. R., & Guo, Z. (2025). Urban young women's attitudes, preferences, and expected effects of fertility support policies. South China Population, (4), 12-24. [7] Zhang, L. X., Zhao, D. D., & Fan, C. (2022). A study on youth fertility intention deficiency based on self-determination theory. China Youth Study, (9), 36-42. [8] Li, X. Y., & Sun, J. M. (2023). The influence of family capital on urban residents' fertility intention: An empirical analysis based on CGSS data. Gansu Theory Journal, (2), 110-119. [9] Zeng, L. F., Xin, Z. C., Xu, Z., et al. (2025). Improving the social security system and residents' fertility rate: From the perspective of long-term care insurance. Financial Research, (11), 58-76. [10] Cai, H., Wang, X. Y., & Ding, R. C. (2025). Research on the influence of childcare services on urban youth fertility intention. Northwest Population Journal, 46(5), 113-126. [11] Yang, Z. (2025). Does family education expenditure reduce youth re-fertility intention? An empirical analysis based on CFPS data. Journal of Educational Research, (12), 87-96. [12] Shi, Y. J., Gui, Y., & Zhang, T. F. (2025). How does digital platform dependence affect youth fertility? Cultivation effect and cleavage mechanism of media "usage gap". Media Observer, (6), 88-100. [13] Zhang, L. (2024). The influence of materialistic values on young women's fertility intention: Deconstructing fertility dilemmas in a low-fertility culture. Collection of Women's Studies, (3), 56-68. [14] Dong, L., Liu, X. R., & Guo, Z. (2025). Urban young women's attitudes, preferences, and expected effects of fertility support policies. South China Population, 40(4), 12-24. [15] Ni, S. (2025). Perceived economic uncertainties and childbearing intentions among young cohorts in China: A multinomial analysis. Journal of Biosocial Science, 57(2), 296-314. [16] Dantis, C., & Rizzi, E. L. (2020). Transition to first birth during the Great Recession: The case of Greece. Genus, 76, 1-21. [17] Devedžić, M., Mirić, N., & Gligorijević, V. (2017). Does specific demographic education change young people's opinions about reproduction? The case of Serbia. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(4), 533-546. [18] Shi, Y. J. (2024). On what basis do young people have children? The influence of family capital on youth fertility intention. Youth Exploration, (3), 67-78.
Copyright @ 2020-2035 Academic Education Publishing House All Rights Reserved